0
What did Congress use the Interstate Commerce Clause to achieve in Heart of Atlanta Motel v US?
Congress used the Interstate Commerce Clause of Article I to enact Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in an effort to end racial discrimination in privately owned public accommodations.
Title II regulated hotels, motels, restaurants, service stations, and other businesses that were, or could potentially be, involved in interstate commerce.
In Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US, 379 US 241 (1964), Moreton Rolleston, an attorney and owner of The Heart of Atlanta Motel, petitioned the US Supreme Court for an injunction against enforcing the Civil Rights Act. Rolleston claimed the act was unconstitutional because it violated his protection under the Fifth Amendment Takings and Due Process Clauses, and placed him in involuntary servitude, as prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment.
The US Supreme Court ruled against Rolleston, holding discrimination in renting rooms to African-Americans impeded the flow of interstate commerce, and was well within Congress' right to regulate.
For more information, see Related Links, below.
What else can I help you with?
Long range purpose of the Albany Congress in 1754?
Achieve colonial unity and a common defense against the French threat.
How did president Johnson's previous experience in congress help to achieve passage of the civil rights act?
President Johnson's former experience in congress made him a strong politician. As a result, he fought for civil rights and did not want to take "no" for an answer.
What did the delegates to the stamp act congress hope to achieve by sending a pettition to the british king and parliament?
They hoped that it would end both the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act.
In what year did Ohio achieve statehood?
February 19th 1803, Thomas Jefferson signed an Act of Congress that approved Ohio's boundaries and constitution, but due to an oversight, Congress never passed a resolution formally admitting Ohio as the 17th state in the Union. When this oversight was discovered in 1953 a Bill of Congress was introduced to admit Ohio to the Union retroactive to March 1st 1803. On August 7th 1953 President Eisenhower signed an Act that officially declared March 1st 1803 the date of Ohio's admittance to the Union.
What are some quotes from Bessie Blount Griffin?
"If you can do it, do it..If you can achieve it, achieve it."
What can congress fix the standards for?
One of the most important functions of Congress is in facilitating trade among the States and between the United States and foreign countries. The intent of the so-called commerce clause was to compel Congress to only lower barriers to trade, in the attempt to achieve a no-restrictions free market among the States. One way Congress can facilitate trade is by setting and maintaining a set of national weights and measures.
Does Congress have a role in the amendment proces?
Yes, both Houses of Congress have to achieve a super majority (two-thirds) in a vote.
What was the Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US case about?
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 US 241 (1964)AnswerHeart of Atlanta was one of several challenges against the recently enacted Civil Rights Act of 1964, that sought to end racial discrimination in public accommodations, among other things. This case dealt exclusively with Title II, that regulated under the Article I Interstate Commerce Clause, hotels, motels, restaurants, service stations, and other businesses that were, or could potentially be, involved in interstate commerce.Moreton Rolleston, an attorney and owner of The Heart of Atlanta Motel, petitioned the Court for an injunction against enforcing the Civil Rights Act under the claim that the act was unconstitutional, so that he could continue his policy of racial discrimination (primarily) against African-Americans.ExplanationAttorney Moreton Rolleston, owner of The Heart of Atlanta Motel in Atlanta, Georgia, petitioned the US Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Rolleston only had standing to address Title II §§ 201 (a), (b)(1) and (c)(1) of the Act (because it directly involved his business operations), which read:§ 201 (a)"All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin."§ 201 (b)(1)"any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence;"§ 201 (c)(1)(c) The operations of an establishment affect commerce within the meaning of this title if(1) it is one of the establishments described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b);The purpose of the Act, among other things, was to prohibit racial discrimination in places of public accommodation, including the petitioner's motel, which had a policy of refusing service to African-Americans.According to Rolleston, Congress had exceeded its authority under the Article I Interstate Commerce Clause; had violated his protection under the Fifth Amendment Takings and Due Process Clauses; and had placed him in involuntary servitude, as prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment.Rolleston sought declatory relief (a judgment affirming specified legal rights under a contract or statute) and an injunction against enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The United States counter-claimed for enforcement of the Act.A three-judge panel of the District Court for the Northern District of Georgia sustained the validity of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and issued a permanent injuntion against The Heart of Atlanta Motel, restraining them from continuing violation of the civil rights legislation. The case was sent to the US Supreme Court on expedited appeal (bypassing the usual intermediate step of being heard by the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit). Justice Hugo Black, who had authority to oversee emergency motions for the Eleventh Circuit, sustained (ordered it to remain in effect) the District Court's injunction while the Supreme Court considered the case.Supreme Court DecisionIn the majority opinion, authored by Justice Tom C. Clark, the Court noted that The Heart of Atlanta Motel was located near the junction of two busy interstate highways, and actively solicited out-of-state business. The Court held that making rooms unavailable to African-Americans impeded the flow of interstate commerce, and was well within Congress' right to regulate.Further, the Fifth Amendment does not prevent Congress from exercising the reasonable regulation of business.Citing the landmark case Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824), Justice Clark quoted sections of Chief Justice Marshall's opinion regarding the power of the Interstate Commerce Clause:"It is the power to regulate; that is, to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed. This power, like all others vested in Congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the constitution. . . . If, as has always been understood, the sovereignty of Congress . . . is plenary as to those objects [specified in the Constitution], the power over commerce . . . is vested in Congress as absolutely as it would be in a single government, having in its constitution the same restrictions on the exercise of the power as are found in the constitution of the United States. The wisdom and the discretion of Congress, their identity with the people, and the influence which their constituents possess at elections are, in this, as in many other instances, as that, for example, of declaring war, the sole restraints on which they have relied, to secure them from its abuse. They are the restraints on which the people must often rely solely, in all representative governments."Justice Clark concluded: "In short, the determinative test of the exercise of power by the Congress under the Commerce Clause is simply whether the activity sought to be regulated is "commerce which concerns more States than one" and has a real and substantial relation to the national interest. Let us now turn to this facet of the problem."In framing Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Congress was legislating against what it considered a moral problem using means provided by the Constitution. The ultimate goal of the Act is not constrained by the legal process used to achieve it, as long as that process is valid, which the Court believed it was (is).Finally, Justice Clark addressed the basis of Rolleston's other constitutional claims, stating the legislation was unlikely to cause a loss of business or income, but even if it impinged on an individual business, that is no barrier to anti-discrimination legislation. The Court found no merit in Rolleston's claims of "involuntary servitude" under the Thirteenth Amendment.The finding of the District Court was affirmed.For more information, see Related Questions and Related Links, below.
What environmental problems could interstate compacts address and what solutions could they achieve?
They can address issues more effectively than a state agency acting ... there is no satisfactory way to achieve a reconciliation of divergent interpretations. ... Although there are many types of interstate compacts, they can generally be ... The purpose of the commission is to examine a problem and report to the ChaCha again!
What environmental problems could interstate compacts address and what solution could they achieve?
They can address issues more effectively than a state agency acting ... there is no satisfactory way to achieve a reconciliation of divergent interpretations. ... Although there are many types of interstate compacts, they can generally be ... The purpose of the commission is to examine a problem and report to the ChaCha again!
How did the second continental congress try to achieve peace with Britain?
I don"t kow
Why hasn't the democratic congress stopped funding for the war in Iraq?
They have not had the votes necessary to achieve this from their fellow members.
How much does a removalist cost in Gold Coast?
Interstate transfers typically start at $1,500 for a single or couple and can amount to $7,500 for large families. Considering the care and skill that Removalists put into their interstate movement, the one-time fee is worth it. It is not recommended to try to move interstate without assistance. Most Australians only move interstate once or twice in their lives, if they do, so it's best to spend what you need to spend to achieve the smoothest possible Gold Coast movement. In the long run, a few hundred dollars here or there shouldn't deter you from selecting an interstate Removalist you trust.
The long range purpose of the Albany Congress in 1754 was to declare war on the Iroquois tribe?
The purpose of the Albany Congress in 1754 was to achieve colonial unity and common defense against the French threat.
What is the difference between commerce and management and administration?
Commerce typically refers to the buying and selling of goods and services, while management and administration involve overseeing and coordinating the resources and activities of an organization to achieve its goals. Commerce is more focused on the actual exchange of goods or services, while management and administration encompass the broader aspects of organizing and directing business operations.
What did the atlanta campaign achieve?
In battlefeld terms, nothing much. Grant had ordered Sherman to destroy the Army of Tennessee, and he had failed to achieve this. But driving them out of Atlanta and capturing the city made a big story in the Northern press, and helped to raise civilian morale in the run-up to the crucial General Election that could decide the fate of the war. The fall of Atlanta was followed by the highly-successful March to the Sea, which shortened the war by months at almost nil casualties.
Long range purpose of the Albany Congress in 1754?
Achieve colonial unity and a common defense against the French threat.
