basically palestine was a country including west bank and jerasulaem
Palestine was a region, taken by the British from the dissolving Ottoman Empire,
and administered by the British until their decision to leave the area, whereupon
the UN designated the larger part of the region for Arab control, and the smaller
part of the region for Jewish control. The region known as Palestine included lands
that are now parts of Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, and Israel. Palestine has never been
a country.
America invaded the land and gave the land to the Jews
No nation from North or South America, including the USA, has ever "invaded" any
part of the region formerly known as Palestine. The only "invasion" was the one by
the combined armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, that immediately
followed Israel's declaration of sovereignty in 1948.
and theres constant battles between them over ownership of the land
There are no constant battles. There are relatively constant and relatively limited
terrorist activity against Israel and its civilian population, and relatively infrequent
and relatively large Israeli military reactions in defense of its territory and its citizens.
The debate has nothing to do with "ownership of the land", which is obvious
since so many Palestinian Arab citizens of Israel own land in Israel.
The debate is over the existence of a Jewish country.
basically America invaded it illegally well it was illegally found was it it may
that but it not it's just lieing about it read this cause you don't you'll never
know the truth now will you mhaw
Unintelligible. Our internet connection must be fading out.
oh well what can you do Americas the superpower and they control the media and the u.n its a shame
It's normally applied to a version of events that a group of people believe to be true in direct conflict to the official version. Two well known examples of conspiracy theories are that man did NOT land on the moon but all the televised lunar landings were in fact an elaborate hoax, and that Roswell was not a Project MOGUL weather balloon carrying prototype spy gear but an alien landing on the Earth.It should be noted that conspiracy theorists often have to ignore available facts in order to promote their beliefs. For example, the technology to fake the Apollo flights, moon rocks, and video, etc. does not yet exist, let alone exist in 1969. And all the hard evidence at Roswell (photos) are of Project MOGUL wreckage.___A conspiracy is where a group of people plan a secret task that is only known to selected people.____A conspiracy theory:Claims that nothing is what is appears to be.That the 'official' version or explanation is untrue, but that there is a secret, true version.That 'the powers that be' are actively trying to suppress the true version in order to dupe the public.Pretends that some vast group of conspirators actually cares what the public believes.
There are many fruits and vegetables that America imports. America imports raspberries and strawberries for example during the winter season.
Your question is impossible to answer because we simply do not have all the names of Caesar's allies. In fact, we don't even have all the names of Cesar's killers. For example, there was a group of between 30 and 60 senators (sources vary) who were in on the conspiracy out of about 900 senators at the time of Caesar. However, if you are referring to the most prominent men who were not in on the conspiracy, they were Cicero and Marc Antony.
the US, south america and asia was a place the conquered.
French fries. :) ^^^^^ French Fries were made in America. The french brought pastries and baked goods (For example: Croissants.
Is my answer refute an example
To do what? A conspiracy to, for example, steal newspapers, is going to be punished differently than one to commit murder.
Example sentence - There are numerous theories on how best to educate children.
Conspiracy trues are not true; they are the beliefs of madmen, crooks, sectants. And, if rarely an example of this theory is true is only a coincidence.
we feel more comfortable when our experiences fall into some sort of order or comprehensible structure or can be explained clearly. That is why we turn to faith, to feelings and to conspiracy theories if some kind of political response is involved. At various levels of plausibility, we are willing to believe rigged elections, faked landing on the moon, oil companies/big pharmaceuticals/big corporations in general working overtime against interests of the common man, government covering up the foreign incursions or conflict among various members of the Cabinet and a dark hand swinging the stock up and down on the Wall Street or Dalal Street. We are inclined to take the conspiratorial view of political events without much proof because some of them make rational sense, even without visible smoking guns. It is only human to hold emotional beliefs and unprovable theories. At times it makes one feel guilty as political stories are without evidence, but still they are logically possible and even very probable. Conspiracies, real or imagined, are not new. In classical times, Athens accused Socrates of conspiring to introduce new gods and corrupting the youth of the city. Ancient Rome was a hotbed of conspiracy and political assassination. Roman Church and European Kings and Dukes were perpetually conspiring against each other until Napoleon decisively cut the Pope to size. However, a distinction needs to be made between conspiracy and conspiracy theory. A conspiracy is an event (or series of events) that has actually taken place. A ‘conspiracy theory’ is a belief in a conspiracy that may or may not have taken place. Conspiracy theories or theoretical conspiracies usually have an ideological basis that could be political or religious. Since modern politics derives from European history, it will be appropriate to cite a few examples from European history. For example, alleged papal plots against Protestant Europe from the Counter-Reformation onwards were universally believed. In the 17th century witchcraft conspiracy theories prevailed. Freemasons, Jews, Fabians, ‘One World Government’ supporters (whoever they might be), Communists, Small Greys (aliens), the KGB, the CIA and/or the US government were and are still to some extent suspect in the eyes of some people for conspiring to take over the entire world order. We are constantly beset by conspiracy theories and a ‘respectable’ literature of conspiracy theory has evolved and serious research is going on conspiracy theory. Seminars and conferences on conspiracy theory are held from time to time. Among the important and high profile conspiracy theories is the longstanding J.F. Kennedy set of theories of varying levels of credibility—about why and how he was killed; by contract killers hired by Cubans or the Mafia. Now several theories have emerged about 9/11. One intriguing 9/11 suggestion throws up an Israeli government connection because, as the theorist says, “only the Israelis were clever enough to make it work.” The plethora of such ‘theories’ has generated its own literature, including Richard Hofstadter’s influential The Paranoid Style in American Politics and other Essays, first published in 1964, after JFK’s assassination, and still in circulation. Hofstadter, a critic of conservative Americans, argued that assassination was a ‘recessive gene’ in US politics. Conferences on conspiracy theory have led to two developments: the academic view that conspiracy theories deserve serious study and examination as social/cultural phenomena and, that some conspiracy theories might have a basis in evidence. For instance, a two-day session at the University of London’s Birkbeck College in 2001, on conspiracy theories, the topics included: The popularity of conspiracy theory as a mode of explanation; Did the supposedly scientific and rational thought of the Enlightenment, or other intellectual movements, undermine the foundations upon which these theories were constructed, or did they merely alter their forms? Why were witches, heretics and religious minorities perceived in conspiratorial terms? Why was the outbreak of the French Revolution frequently explained in conspiratorial terms, and why did European rulers and their subjects remain obsessed with conspiracies both real and imagined? For the classroom teacher, conspiracy theories can be both pleasant and unpleasant distraction. A teacher recalls a most enjoyable though very heated debate in his history class, about Roswell and Area 51 (US government/alien conspiracy), which had nothing to do with the French Revolution that he was supposed to be teaching to that class, but it led to an intense discussion about assessment of evidence. The US lecturer Marcus LiBrizzi uses conspiracy theories to motivate his students. However, classroom discussion involving conspiracy theories needs careful preparation because of the intricacy and complexity of many of the theories. The greatest problem with conspiracy theories is their shifting grounds, mainly because there is usually great eagerness amongst advocates of conspiracy theories to mistake coincidence for conspiracy and they are difficult to prove/disprove. For example, as a sceptic, one might say, ‘JFK was NOT KILLED by a second shooter on the grassy knoll.’ But how to prove it? Then, most conspiracy theories are wrapped in circular logic. Typically, the arguments go: ‘Freemasons secretly control the world.’ ‘But there’s no evidence that they control the world.’ ‘That’s because they are doing it in secret!’ Or, ‘Yasser Arafat did not die of natural causes. He was poisoned’. This despite no evidence of poisoning in a 500-page post-mortem medical file of the concerned French medical authorities. The conspiracy theorists would say that the French medical authorities tested only for KNOWN poisons and Arafat was killed by an UNKNOWN poison. Circular logic! Conspiracy theories especially attract the adolescents (and delayed adolescents), because they appear more colourful than a fact-based alternative. That JFK was killed by a whole host of assassins and conspirators rather than by a solitary gunman is surely more raving; and so is to believe that Harold Holt was spying for the Chinese and was whisked away by a Chinese submarine instead of drowning in the surf. Thriller writers know the emotional lift of gaining ‘inside knowledge’ and use the clandestine nature of their narrative to make the reader feel as an ‘insider’ in their esoteric world. Dan Brown, in his The Da Vinci Code [2004], uses this factor most effectively and succeeds in turning a badly written book into a best seller.
In any sane society people are innocent unless proved guilty. You can't prove a negative.The accusations, such as making Germany lose World War 1 and causing the Great Depression, were expressed in a way that presupposed collective (racial) responsibility, including that of people in no position whatever to influence such events (for example, children).The "charges" were vague accusations about complex issues.There was no evidence, just conspiracy theories - and conspiracy theories are often formulated in a way that doesn't allow for proof (or disproof).
Example sentence - There are numerous theories on how best to educate children.
One example of a sacred myth is the official conspiracy theory of 9/11.
Theories don't last foreverThey exist until replaced by better theoriesMore durable (lasting) theories may come to belabelled 'laws' - for example, the law of diminishingreturns in economics
The plural form of the noun theory is theories.The plural possessive form is theories'.example: All of his theories' validity is questionable.
Example: sometimes (it is a very rare phenomenon) a boy is born with no testicles, with one testicle or with three testicles. Example: some persons believe that they are created by a god. Example: some persons believe in catastrophic theories and conspiration theories.
It's normally applied to a version of events that a group of people believe to be true in direct conflict to the official version. Two well known examples of conspiracy theories are that man did NOT land on the moon but all the televised lunar landings were in fact an elaborate hoax, and that Roswell was not a Project MOGUL weather balloon carrying prototype spy gear but an alien landing on the Earth.It should be noted that conspiracy theorists often have to ignore available facts in order to promote their beliefs. For example, the technology to fake the Apollo flights, moon rocks, and video, etc. does not yet exist, let alone exist in 1969. And all the hard evidence at Roswell (photos) are of Project MOGUL wreckage.___A conspiracy is where a group of people plan a secret task that is only known to selected people.____A conspiracy theory:Claims that nothing is what is appears to be.That the 'official' version or explanation is untrue, but that there is a secret, true version.That 'the powers that be' are actively trying to suppress the true version in order to dupe the public.Pretends that some vast group of conspirators actually cares what the public believes.