The Fugitive Slave Law.
The Three Fifths Compromise stated that slaves counted as 3/5 of a person for counts for deciding taxation and representation. Whether it was a good thing is a personal opinion.
Slaves were the property of their owners.
Simply stated as "blood flow compromise", which is anything that may prevent proper blood flow such as a hemorrhage, plaque atherosclerosis, etc.
Fugitive slave law
The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Paragraph 3 of the United States Constitution
I think it was the 3/5th compromise
No. Slavery is no longer legal in America, therefore dismissing the compromise which stated that slaves were counted as 3/5th of a person regarding representation and taxation for states.
Chief Justice, Roger Taney, in the Dred Scott trial, when it reached the Supreme Court in 1857.
If you will look into the Fugitive Slave Law I believe you will find what your looking for. It was put in act in 1850. Good Luck! -13 year old
The Compromise of 1850
Southerners believed that the Fugitive Slave Clause in the United States Constitution gave them the legal right to retrieve runaway slaves. This clause, found in Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3, required that escaped slaves be returned to their owners. Additionally, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 further reinforced this belief by mandating the return of escaped slaves to their owners, regardless of the laws of the state in which they were found. These legal provisions were used by southerners to justify their actions in pursuing and recapturing runaway slaves.
The three-fifths compromise was necessary in order to gain the support of both the Northern and Southern states for how slaves would be counted for the purpose of apportioning representation in the U.S. House of Representatives. Taxation was also affected by this apportionment but the main issue was representation. If slaves were counted as a whole person, the South would have a larger representation; if slaves didn't count at all, the North would have a larger representation. So to satisfy each side, the Constitution stated that slaves would be counted as 3/5ths of a person; a compromise between the two extremes.
The issue of the Three-Fifths Compromise was resolved at the Constitutional Convention, which determined how slaves would be counted for the purpose of taxation and representation in Congress. The compromise stated that each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for these purposes.
Three-Fifths Compromise
The Three Fifths Compromise stated that slaves counted as 3/5 of a person for counts for deciding taxation and representation. Whether it was a good thing is a personal opinion.
in the house of representatives
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee