C. A newspaper article attacking a presidential candidate written by the candidate's chief opponent
Answer this
An academic journal that describes all of a presidential candidate's political beliefs and philosophies question…
Without the alternatives we cannot answer
Newspaper article
WikiAnswers is not a credible source. Credible means believable. Some examples: Diplomas hanging in my doctor's office show me that she is credible. A witness who does not come across to the jury as credible will not help the case. I didn't let the man into our home because his claim to be a police officer did not seem credible.
There are no records or credible accounts of any strange events happening to Nat Turner when he was born. It is important to rely on verified historical information rather than myths or legends.
characters that seem real or realistic. Note: superheros are NOT credible characters.
Look through your sources for information you can use
because its not healthy and does not grow in the ground
The historian often has much more information than he, or she, can use in answering a historical question. He, or she, must sort that information into what is important in the progression of the story. Too much information is as bad as too little. Consider discarding any information that is not vital to telling the story, however, you may choose to include a few information snippets to make the story interesting and draw your reader into events. Asking and answering yourself questions can help in sorting information. Use only the most important and credible historical sources. Consider discarding information from secondary sources, rather than primary sources. If you have information from two sources, one a primary source and one a secondary source use the primary source information, you can always cite the secondary source as reference. The historian seeks to use sources to compile a logical narrative that leads to a credible reconstruction. Historical writing is exactly the same as any other writing, it needs to be clear, concise, and say the necessary in a brief, but complete way.
What determines if information is credible?
Credible is believable, based on information or fact.
credible sources will have the most accurate information
Credible is believable, based on information or fact.
Credible is believable, based on information or fact; not credible is not believable because it may be based on opinion, a biased source, and contain little actual information or fact.
Wikipedia can be credible if the editor cited beyond the page but if the information is not cited the information may or may not be correct.
"Credible" is defined as "Being believable, based on information, source or fact." - Something that is credible, is reliable, it's trustworthy.
There is no verified information regarding Marcus Garvey's sexual orientation. It is important to rely on credible sources for accurate information about historical figures.
Believable is most likely to be the definition of credible.
Wiki isn't a credible source, because, it doesn't really give off correct information.
Non credible. Google is just a vast collection of unverified information. Not credible as a source for valid information. Google can NEVER be listed in your works cited or bibliography. Google is just a search engine that is programed to search one of the worlds largest databases. The data base is not vetted for validity ( it would be impossible ).