0
What else can I help you with?
What is the best example of a secondary source document useful in the study of history?
A letter from a relative of a participant in a battle or campaign
What was one advantage of using aircraft carriers?
the most useful reason is so that they do not need to refuel while on the ship. they could also switch the type of payload that the plane was carrying.
Why would historians find it useful to have different versions of the battle of qadesh from rameses ii's time?
Because the same story from different sources is more likely to be true than a story from only one source.
Why are peanuts so useful?
Because they are useful.
How do you find out about women in China binding their feet?
Try the following link: http://www.ccds.charlotte.nc.us/History/China/04/hutchins/hutchins.htm There is an article on foot binding with links to other websites that may be useful
Describe in details th advantages and disadvantages of secondary sources of information?
Secondary sources of information are those that have been previously compiled, analyzed, or interpreted by someone else, rather than being collected firsthand. These sources can provide valuable insights and information for research or decision-making, but they also have some advantages and disadvantages. Advantages of Secondary Sources: Accessibility: Secondary sources are readily available and easy to access. They are often published and distributed widely, making them more accessible than primary sources, which may be difficult to locate or obtain. Cost-effective: Secondary sources are often less expensive than primary sources. This is because primary data collection can be time-consuming and expensive, while secondary sources can be obtained at a lower cost. Large sample size: Secondary sources often provide a large sample size, which can be useful for statistical analysis and generalization. For example, census data provides a large sample of a population, making it useful for studying Demographics and trends. Time-saving: Secondary sources can save time, as they have already been compiled and analyzed. Researchers can use them to quickly gain an overview of a subject, identify trends, or develop a hypothesis. Broad perspective: Secondary sources can provide a broad perspective on a subject, as they often draw on a range of sources and viewpoints. This can be useful for developing a comprehensive understanding of a topic. Disadvantages of Secondary Sources: Quality issues: The quality of secondary sources can vary widely. Some sources may be outdated, inaccurate, or biased, making them unreliable or unsuitable for research. Limited scope: Secondary sources may have a limited scope, focusing only on a particular aspect of a subject. This can be a disadvantage for researchers who need a more comprehensive understanding of a topic. Lack of control: Researchers have no control over the design, methodology, or data collection process of secondary sources. This can make it difficult to assess the quality and reliability of the information. Inappropriate for some research: Some research questions may require primary data collection, such as when the required information is not available in secondary sources or when the research question requires specific data that cannot be obtained from secondary sources. Copyright issues: Some secondary sources may be subject to copyright restrictions, which can limit their use or distribution. In conclusion, secondary sources of information have both advantages and disadvantages. They can be a useful tool for research and decision-making, but researchers need to be aware of their limitations and potential quality issues. It is important to critically evaluate secondary sources before using them to ensure that they are reliable and appropriate for the research question at hand.
When do you use secondary sources in doing research?
Secondary sources are documents written after an event has occurred, providing secondhand accounts of that event, person, or topic. Primary sources provide first-hand accounts, but secondary sources offer different perspectives.The reason you might want to use secondary sources in doing research is because they might provide a more objective perspective. They can provide you with background information, offer analysis of the event or person by someone who is somewhat removed.Scholarly articles are written by experts studying in a particular field, and interpreting their material provides credibility to your research. Secondary sources can also provide historical perspective, based on events that happened afterthe original event.
Which of the following best describes what you should do in the information-gathering stage of the research process?
Read through your sources and collect information that might be useful
How is secondary data useful to researcher?
True
Debate on literary sources are more useful than archelogical sources for writing history?
literary sources are more useful than archaeological sources for writing history
What is a example of a Secondary source?
A secondary source document useful in the study of history could be an autobiography written by someone at the time or a record or statement made by someone who was not an eyewitness to a specific event.
Is there any time a secondary source might be more useful than a primary source?
Usually you will need 'the broad picture' and a primary source won't give you that.Making sense of primary sources is often extremely difficult without expert knowledge of the subject.Primary sources are easily misunderstood.
How are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources?
nhi pata mujhe>>!!
When presenting a chart in a PowerPoint presentation it is useful to mention the following?
When presenting a chart in a power point presentaion, it is useful to mention the following
How primary resources help us?
Primary sources are important because they are the original documents, written by the person himself or herself; and in many cases, they were written by people who were actually there when an event took place. When doing research, it is useful to find as many primary sources as you can, because they give you first-hand information, in the person's own words. For example, if you are doing a report on Abraham Lincoln, you can find sources about him (called "secondary sources") written by other people; but you can also find his own words and his own writings, which tell you what he was thinking and feeling about a certain issue. A good research paper will use a blend of primary and secondary sources if at all possible.
How useful is set in your daily life?
Intensely useful on the grounds that it enables me to get to the following day.
Do you think the distinct between the concepts of primary and secondary succession is useful?
thyre both not
