Ann Putnam, Abigail Williams, Mercy Lewis, Mary Walcott, Mary Warren and Sussanh Sheldon were accusers. We have no idea what they were like because no one records the personalities of random girls who don't really matter and after the trials, no one wanted to think about those girls.
ergot
No. However, one of the most famous accusers, the only one to leave accusations, be accused and rejoin the accusers, was named Mary Warren.
Yes, and no. Some people like Japan some people don't. So we have mixed relation ship. I don't like the arrogant people there but some are nice, but there a lot of arrogant people there. : \
In this particular case, more women than men may have been involved as both the accused and the accusers due to societal power dynamics, historical gender roles, and potential biases in the legal system.
Maybe because people like the ocean, the weather, etc. Or maybe for some people, they were born there and they like it there.
The Accusers has 400 pages.
The afflicted girls are the accusers.
Yes
At his trial, Socrates divided his accusers into two camps. The old accusers thought of him as a criminal, given to excessive examination of all, and a teacher of weak argument. New accusers followed the prejudices of the old accusers, perhaps having learned to hate him based on their arguments as they had grown up.
Well, if you don't know who were the accusers, then you might have some problems in your research. For starters, the Nazis were the main, primary, and biggest accusers. The Germans, though far behind, were second, then many of the other peoples throughout Europe were the other accusers.
I'm going to answer this under the assumation that you are asking why the people named as witches were named. No one knows exactly why. If the afflicted accusers were aware of who they were choosing as witches, the accused were most lilkey easy targets whose accusations wouldn't be challenged in the beginning and, after the gained influence and credibility, people who refused to believe the accusers were called out. If the accusers were under the influence of a physical or mental illness, there is no way to map the accusations.
You have your facts mixed up. Those accused of witchcraft were unlucky and did not go mad. The accusers were the ones who were crazy. There is no proof that poison caused the accusers to do what they did, but some people do think that Ergotism, the technical term for poisoning resulting from eating Ergot infected wheat, may have been the agent that caused affliction.
c The Sixth Amendment's declaration that people accused of a crime have the right to know who their accusers are.
ergot
One of Socrates' accusers was Meletus, a young poet who accused him of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens.
Socrates describes his accusers as being deceitful and dishonest, manipulating people with false accusations. He criticizes them for spreading rumors and misunderstandings about him, instead of engaging in honest dialogue and seeking the truth. Socrates believes they are driven by envy and fear of the unknown.
they would be questioned as to who/what their accusations were about.