Want this question answered?
herbivore. some are carnivore.
The producer gives energy to the herbivore. Without the producer the herbivore would die out, then the carnivores, then the omnivores.
A sloth is a consumer because it eats something else.If it was a producer it would produce its own food from its body and eat that.If it was a decomposer it would most likely be dead and it would be matter or a material for the plants.
Effect of fuel subsidy removal in nigeria economy
The removal of an herbivore can have cascading effects on the entire community. It can lead to an increase in plant populations, decreased biodiversity, and potentially impact other species that rely on the herbivore for food or habitat. This disruption can alter energy flow and ecosystem dynamics.
A loss of a producer means that there will be less food for consumers since producers are the foundation of an ecosystem
A drastic reduction in producer organisms in a meadow environment would likely disrupt the food chain, leading to a decline in herbivore populations due to lack of food. This, in turn, would impact predator populations that rely on herbivores for food. Overall, it could result in a significant shift in the ecosystem's balance and biodiversity.
No. That would not be a side effect of gallbladder removal.
No. A Venus's flytrap is a plant and therefore primarily a producer since it photosynthesises. You could say it 'eats' insects too, but that would make it a carnivore.
I would say Herbivore, because the herbivore would first eat the plants, and then the carnivore would eat the herbivore.........something like that... ~hope it helps! ^_~
If the producers are dramatically reduced then the consumers will also reduce.
If the price floor was set below the equilibrium price, then the removal of this price floor would have no effect on producer and consumer surplus. If the price floor was set above the equilibrium price for that product, then prices with shift down again to the equilibrium price. Consumers would want to buy more, and producers would want to sell more, until they reach the equilibrium price and quantity. In other words all surpluses of deficits would eventually disappear.