answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

exclusionary rule

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Evidence that is obtained illegally may not be used in a trial. What is this idea called?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Evidence that is obtained illegally may not not be used in trial. What is this idea called?

exclusionary rule


Evidence that is obtained illegally may not be used in trial. What is this idea called?

exclusionary rule


Evidence that is obtained illegally may not be used in trial what is this idea called?

exclusionary rule


Can illegally obtained email be used in a criminal case?

The accused has the right to challenge the admissibility of any evidence used against them at trial. Whether an e-mail or any other evidence is "illegally obtained" is subject to the interpretation of the court, not the accused. If the court rules that evidence is obtained unlawfully, it can be suppressed at trial and not considered.


Evidence that may not be used against a defendant in a criminal trial because it was obtained illegally is an example of the?

exclusionary rule


What is the rule that says evidence may not be used against a defendant in a criminal trial if it was obtained illegally.?

In law this is known as the exclusionary rule.


What does the exclusionary rule dictate?

The exclusionary rule dictates that any evidence obtained with an improperly received search warrant or evidence obtained without any search warrant would be held inadmissible in a criminal trial.


What is the process to have evidence suppressed in the courtroom?

You can file a written motion for an evidence suppression hearing. You can also orally object or request a sidebar (request to approach the judge) to the use of evidence if you have solid proof that it was obtained illegally or would be generally inadmissible in a trial.


The standard that illegally seized evidence cannot not be used at trial is known as the?

Mapp rule


Illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in a court of law this statement is based on a person constitutional right to?

protection against double jeopardy I do not think this is a protection again Double Jeopardy as this is a person not being able to be tried for the same crime twice. It is the right to a fair and just trial. Illegally obtaining evidence can be altered (such as recording devices). Also, illegally obtaining evidence breaches a persons Human Rights set out in the European Convention for Human Rights as it would likely be a breach of their Right to Private Life (Article 8). Generally, evidence that is not obtained properly and fairly is considered inadmissible


What is the main purpose of the exclusionary rule?

The Exclusionary Rule's purpose is to keep certain evidence from being used against you in a criminal trial. Police procedure in gathering evidence against you is heavily dictated by cases interpreting the Fourth Amendment. Evidence gathered in violation of your Constitutional rights is subject to the Exclusionary Rule.


Why may illegally seized evidence not be used in a trial?

any evidence will be described as illegal if there is proof that it was forcefully obtained,without permission properly investigated .