If a debtor was notified in writing that payment for a debt is expected to be made in full by a certain date, that party is put on notice that full payment is expected on or by the end of a certain amount of time. If a debtor does not or did not respond to the letter, that debtor could be viewed as accepting of the terms of that letter. Was there anything unfair about asking the debtor to pay the debt in full? It doesn't sound like it from the question. It might seem unfair now, but what about when the letter first came? If so, then would have been the time to say so. It might be viewed that any complaint of unfairness made now is just a stall. Now to the payment. A debtor who makes a payment on a debt after already being notified that the debt is to be made good in its entirety cannot fairly expect the fact that he has paid some of the debt to be an acceptable new arrangement of terms by the party holding the IOU. Here is another way to say that. A party, a debtor, owes monies. The debtor got a letter that says payment is to be made in full by a cutoff date. The debtor makes a partial payment of the debt. The holder of the IOU has no obligation to see that taking the partial payment indicates approval of any kind of payment plan. A partial payment on a debt fairly owed in full does not a payment plan make, except perhaps in the mind of the debtor. It's time for the debtor to approach the one holding the IOU and attempt renegotiation of the terms. Whether this is done in person or by letter is up to the debtor. And it might be possible that a third party or arbiter can be of assistance. The burden is clearly on the debtor. The application of common sense and some critical thinking will reveal the truth of the matter. Attorneys can make a case for just about anything, but they are expensive. If both the parties involved in this case end up in small claims court, it is probable that most any judge would repeat what has been said here. As always, consult a legal professional in cases where significant issues are involved. If I cut myself, I wash the cut and put on a band aid. If I break my leg, I go to the doctor (or emergency room physician) and get treatment. Good luck.
Yes. Once the lending agreement is in default the lender may take whatever action they choose in recovering the monies owed. It is a misconception that by making a partial or token payment the creditor will not be able to assert their legal rights. The lender can accept the payment, still repossess the vehicle or pursue litigation.
Vague, confusing question. If the LL accepts a late partial payment, he can still sue the tenant for non payment. UNLESS he writes new contract stating he will not do so.
A partial payment.
A partial payment will stop an eviction but the landlord must be willing to accept it. If they will not accept a partial payment, the eviction will proceed forward.
Yes. He does not have to accept a partial payment.Yes. He does not have to accept a partial payment.Yes. He does not have to accept a partial payment.Yes. He does not have to accept a partial payment.
Yes, you can use Delta miles for partial payment on a flight booking through Delta's Pay with Miles program.
It means to make a partial of full payment without specifying an specific reason or invoice for the payment.
Yes, Wendy's typically accepts 100 bills as payment for purchases.
Yes, Wendy's typically accepts 100 bills as payment, but it may vary by location.
Only if the individual seller accepts it.
When it contains an advance or partial payment.
When it contains an advance or partial payment.