I know exactly what you are talking about. It depends. The United States used two nuclear bombs on Japan to end the Second World War, causing widespread devastation, the death of thousands of civilians, and the surrender of Japan.
This is a matter of opinion. I believe, earnestly, that the actions of the United States here were completely justified. Don't get me wrong. I think it's terrible that human beings have to go through such horrors as this. But I have read too many accounts of American prisoners of the Japanese, too many stories of the Death March and other Japanese cruelty (both sides committed atrocities, but the USA tended to treat POWs much better. In the final days of the European war, Germans flocked to the American lines and fled from the Russians). The war needed to end as soon as possible, and an attack on the Japanese homeland (which was defended by fanatic Japanese, civilians and soldiers alike) was out of the question for a nation that had a nuclear weapon. Most historians will probably agree that to try to take the Japanese homeland using conventional methods would have extended the war by months and years, caused much more bloodshed than the bomb did (the bomb just demoralized them) and used thousands and millions of tons of material more. I honestly believe that the USA was justified, though wars should never even have to start....
they rationed food , gas and other resources. it changed their lives
They still do not know the exact number but all together civilians and solders round up close to 60 Million lives.
Civilians outside of battle zones were reasonably safe, and although they were having difficulty obtaining rationed goods they lived almost normal lives. Soldiers received priority on clothing and food, but those in combat areas were in constant fear for their lives and their safety. Civilians in close contact with the war zones were not intentional targets, but bombs and artillery are indiscriminate.
Russia 10 million soldiers 25 million civilians China 3.5 million soldiers 20 million civilians Germany 5 million soldiers 7 million civilians Japan 2 million soldiers 3 million civilians Poland 250,000 soldiers 5 million civilians
The cost of invading Japan was extrapolated from the previous invasions of Japanese held islands. A conservative estimate was that over a million US servicemen would be casualties and that there would be a similar rate among Japanese civilians, not to mention the Japanese military. The shock value of the A-bomb and the loss of several hundred thousands probably saved several million lives.
describes the lives of many Georgian civilians towards the end of the Civil War?
yes, it has an effect on our lives. the toxins get inside our bodies and pollute it, thus shortening our lives.
It would save lives .
they rationed food , gas and other resources. it changed their lives
yes
Around 7 millions civilians lost their lives in World War 1. Most of these deaths were due to disease and malnutrition.
The civilians have no saying whatsoever in an oligarchy. An oligarchy is only for the chosen lucky ones. They have rule and decisions over everyone and the way they live their lives.
In all wars people lose their lives, family, friend, homes, property and freedoms. With the exception of their lives others gain them.
By killing persians
Do you mean 'Name an animal that lives in another plant without killing it?' If so, one is a bromeliad frog.
They still do not know the exact number but all together civilians and solders round up close to 60 Million lives.
2,403 this includes military & civilians. The Japenese lost 64.