no, there were more in the north than the south
Yes
Because most of the industries were established in the North, whose economy was largely based upon the production and trade of industrial products, while the economy of the South was mostly based upon monoculture and crops developed by slaves' labour. Therefore the North needed a massive employment of more and more specialized manpower, which had to live in the vicinity of the factories, thus growing the size of the cities. The South needed instead more and more land to exploit its agricultural production.
According to recent numerical research and records, the north had a few more casualties than the south during the Civil War, or the battle between North and South. The south suffered 490,309 soldiers killed, wounded, captured or missing, while the north suffered 596,670.
because the south had to give up there slaves and the north didnt own any slaves to give up. and thats why life in the south had to change more dramatically the the life in the north.
The North had more capital than the South because of its dense population. Their industrialization was also much more developed than in the South.
There is more than one Columbia. The country, Colombia, is in South America. The city Columbia is the capital of South Carolina, which is obviously in North America.
no, there were more in the north than the south
Michigan. The most norther part of the Upper Peninsula is more north than South Dakota.
The North had less farm machinery than the South.
Wellington is centered at about 41.32° south latitude. That would be about 1.32° more souther than 40° south latitude.
There is more than one Columbia. The country, Colombia, is in South America. The city Columbia is the capital of South Carolina, which is obviously in North America.
False; the North had far more soldiers than the South.
because the south was more agriculturally focused, where as the north was driven by manufacturing.
There was some slavery, for a time, in the North, but there were more crops in the South than in the North, e.g. less need in the north.
Slavery was more important to the South than it was to the North, because the South's economy relied on agriculture.
becus the south side is more hecazz then the north