answersLogoWhite

0

A pattern of inheritance that the blending hypothesis fails to explain is incomplete dominance, where the heterozygous phenotype is intermediate between the two homozygous phenotypes. This contradicts the blending hypothesis, which suggests that the traits of the parents are mixed together in the offspring. In incomplete dominance, the traits remain distinct in the offspring.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why the blending hypothesis rejected as the method of inheritance?

The blending hypothesis was rejected as the method of inheritance because it could not explain the observed patterns of inheritance, especially the reappearance of traits in later generations that were not visible in the immediate offspring. Additionally, the blending hypothesis does not account for the variation observed in offspring that is more consistent with the principles of Mendelian genetics.


Explain how Mendel's particulate hypothesis is different from the blending hypothesis of inheritance?

Mendel showed in his experiments that inherited traits are not passed through the blending of inheritance theory. According to the blending of inheritance theory, an offspring's traits are a blend between the traits of the parent organisms. In Mendel's experiments however, he showed that this was not true, and that inheritance is actually based on genes, through the observation of recessive traits. He observed that an offspring could have a trait that neither of the parents had, which is now explained through both of the parents having the recessive gene for the trait, but not showing it because they are heterozygous dominant. There is a 25% chance that the offspring of two heterozygous dominant parents will produce a homozygous recessive offspring that will show the trait that neither of the parents shows.


Does a scientific hypothesis describe an observed pattern in nature without attempting to explain it?

False


What is m-m hypothesis?

Hypothesis? Hypothesis is a proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations


What is a hypothesis that does not explain an observation?

When you are using the scientific method, you would try to imagine a hypothesis which explains an observation, but you might not succeed. A hypothesis that does not explain an observation would be considered a failed hypothesis. You would then need to invent a different hypothesis.


Did your data support your hypothesis?

so you have to put in did it help you explain your hypothesis


What is an inheritance Explain different types of inheritance in c?

C is not an object oriented language and therefore has no native support for inheritance.


What is the difference between describe and explain?

Describe is what it is and explain is why it is as it is


What is difference between explain and describe?

Describe is what it is and explain is why it is as it is


Explain Niels Bohr compound nucleus hypothesis?

give the compound nucleus hypothesis


What does the medical term hypothesis mean?

A hypothesis is a theory that attempts to explain a certain phenomenon.


How you explain a situation?

First of all describing a situation depends how a person looks at it or approaches it.To explain any situation or observation a hypothesis can also be formulated.Main points and supporting details is also a good way to describe any situation.