0
What else can I help you with?
What are the two major advantages of the scientific approach over the common sense approach?
The two major advantages of the scientific approach over the common sense approach are that it relies on empirical evidence and systematic procedures to test ideas, leading to more reliable and valid results. Additionally, the scientific approach allows for replication of studies by other researchers, increasing the credibility of the findings.
The importance of experimental approach to scientific law was stressed by?
Francis Bacon, an English philosopher and scientist, stressed the importance of the experimental approach to establishing scientific laws. He believed that observations and experiments were crucial for understanding natural phenomena and forming reliable scientific theories. Bacon's emphasis on empirical evidence laid the foundation for modern scientific methodology.
Scientist are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results
Scientific method is an orderly arrangement of steps?
The scientific method is a systematic approach to conducting research and answering questions. It involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, analyzing data, and drawing conclusions. This structured process helps scientists to ensure that their findings are reliable and can be replicated by others.
How did the new scientific method that was developed in the 1500s and 1600s differ from the traditional approach to science?
The new scientific method focused on systematic observation, experimentation, hypothesis testing, and drawing conclusions based on evidence. This contrasted with the traditional approach that relied more on speculation, reliance on authority, and reasoning based on philosophical principles. The new method emphasized empirical evidence and reproducibility in order to arrive at more reliable and objective results.
Are the answers from the scientific approach more reliable than those based on intuition and common sense?
yes
What do we mean when we say that psychology is empirical?
When we say that psychology is empirical, we mean that it relies on observable and measurable evidence to understand human behavior and mental processes. This involves the use of systematic observation, experimentation, and data collection to test theories and hypotheses. Empirical methods ensure that psychological findings are based on objective, scientific investigation rather than speculation or intuition. Ultimately, this approach helps to establish a more reliable and valid understanding of psychological phenomena.
Why are the answers that flow from the scientific approach more reliable than those based on intuition common sense and information from blogs and the media etc.?
Scientific approaches rely on systematic observation, experimentation, and peer review, which help to minimize bias and errors. This process allows for reproducibility and verification of results, enhancing the reliability of conclusions. In contrast, intuition, common sense, and information from blogs and media are more prone to individual bias, misinformation, and lack of rigorous testing, making them less reliable sources of information.
How is the scientific method similar to or different from superstition guessing intuitio and hope?
The scientific method differs from superstition, guessing, intuition, and hope in that it relies on systematic observation, experimentation, and evidence to draw conclusions. While superstition and intuition may offer explanations based on personal beliefs or feelings, they lack empirical support and repeatability. In contrast, the scientific method emphasizes testing hypotheses and revising theories based on observable data, fostering a more reliable understanding of the natural world. Ultimately, the scientific method seeks objective truth, while superstition and intuition often reflect subjective interpretations or desires.
What are the two major advantages of the scientific approach over the common sense approach?
The two major advantages of the scientific approach over the common sense approach are that it relies on empirical evidence and systematic procedures to test ideas, leading to more reliable and valid results. Additionally, the scientific approach allows for replication of studies by other researchers, increasing the credibility of the findings.
Why is it important to use the scientific method in studying behavior?
Using the scientific method in studying behavior allows researchers to systematically investigate and understand human behavior through empirical evidence and data. This approach helps to ensure that findings are reliable, reproducible, and free from biases or false conclusions. It also helps to establish a solid foundation for building upon existing knowledge and theories in the field of psychology.
The importance of experimental approach to scientific law was stressed by?
Francis Bacon, an English philosopher and scientist, stressed the importance of the experimental approach to establishing scientific laws. He believed that observations and experiments were crucial for understanding natural phenomena and forming reliable scientific theories. Bacon's emphasis on empirical evidence laid the foundation for modern scientific methodology.
Is the psychoanalytic theory reliable?
Psychoanalytic theory, developed by Sigmund Freud, has been criticized for its lack of empirical evidence and untestable concepts. While it has influenced the field of psychology, many aspects of the theory are considered outdated and not supported by contemporary research. Its reliability is therefore a subject of debate among psychologists.
What is John Watson's view of introspection?
John Watson, a pioneer in behaviorism, rejected introspection as a method for studying psychology. He believed that psychology should focus on observable behavior rather than subjective experiences. Watson argued that introspection was not a reliable or scientific method for understanding human behavior.
What make scientific method reliable?
because it is so very reliable
When scientific work can be duplicated it?
Is reliable
Is Scientific American a reliable source for scientific information?
Yes, Scientific American is generally considered a reliable source for scientific information due to its rigorous editorial process and reputation for publishing accurate and credible research.
