answersLogoWhite

0

All reasoning depends at least in part on beliefs. What we accept as a "fact" is a matter of belief. Most people accept things as facts because the people around them believe the same things. Many of these "facts" can be readily disproved scientifically, but are still accepted as fact because there is a social, political or economic pressure to do so.The science of logic accepts this and thus examines not the factual nature of the basis of the reasoning but the coherence of the thought process which leads from the alleged facts to the conclusion.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

If you conduct an experiment and draw conclusions that are based on your beliefs rather than facts you are using?

Objective reasoning


Reasoning that makes conclusions based on patterns?

Inductive reasoning dude...


What is type of reasoning where conclusions are based on patterns you observe called?

inductive reasoning


Type of reasoning where conclusions are based on given facts?

Deductive


What is a type of reasoning where conclusions are based on given facts?

additive property


What is The mental process of forming one belief on the basis of others?

This is known as inference, where new beliefs are drawn from existing beliefs or information. It involves reasoning, logic, and drawing conclusions based on the available data or evidence.


When you form general ideas and rules based on your experience and oberservations you call that form of reasoning?

Forming conclusions based on experience and observations is called inductive reasoning


Which of this best describes inductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning is a type of reasoning where conclusions are made based on patterns and observations. It involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations. It is probabilistic and does not guarantee certainty in the conclusions drawn.


How deductive and inductive reasoning are the same?

Deductive and inductive reasoning are both methods of logical thinking used to draw conclusions. They both involve making observations, forming hypotheses, and reaching conclusions based on evidence. However, deductive reasoning moves from general principles to specific conclusions, while inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.


How does inductive reasoning differ from deductive reasoning?

Inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations or data, while deductive reasoning involves reaching specific conclusions based on general principles or premises. Inductive reasoning is less certain than deductive reasoning because the conclusions are not logically guaranteed by the premises.


Inductive reasoning is an process which means it is based on experiences and observations made in the real world?

Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific instances or observations. It is a bottom-up approach that uses specific examples to draw likely conclusions. This method is often used in scientific research and can lead to probable rather than absolute conclusions.


What type of reasoning that is based on definitions postulates and theorems?

The type of reasoning based on definitions, postulates, and theorems is called deductive reasoning. In this process, conclusions are drawn logically from established premises, allowing for the derivation of new truths from known facts. This method is fundamental in mathematics and logic, where the validity of arguments relies on the structure of the reasoning rather than empirical evidence.