Harry Potter! He can make that wand disappear up the hobo looking guys wewoo knutz already
Scientific laws are generalizations based on observed patterns in nature and cannot be proven true in an absolute sense. They are considered true because they have consistently withstood testing and observation, and have not been contradicted by evidence so far. However, they may be refined or expanded upon by future research and discoveries.
A scientific theory is a theory that explains the scientist's observations, whereas a scientific law is a repeated pattern in the world that we have not sought an explanation for.Also, a scientific theory is proven correct in this time, but may not be correct during future times.
As of now, there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of magic in reality. Magic, as commonly depicted in fiction, involves supernatural forces and abilities that are not currently understood or possible within the laws of physics. While advancements in technology may bring about seemingly magical abilities in the future, they would likely be based on scientific principles rather than true magic.
Scientific Theory is tested by observations and experiments predicted by the theory. If the observations confirm the theory the theory is validated if not the theory is not validated. Experiments themselves need validation, often there are errors in the experiments or observations, e.g Michaelson and Morley Aether experiment and red shift observations.
There is no scientific evidence supporting the existence of ghosts or their ability to physically touch individuals. Reports of ghostly encounters are subjective experiences influenced by belief systems, emotions, and environmental factors.
According to the legend of the three brothers, Death had the invisibility cloak and gave it to the youngest of the three. Most invisibility cloaks were woven from the long, fine, silky, silvery hair of the Demiguise, an animal found with great difficulty in the Far East.
True.
Briefly, the scientific method essentially involves postulating a theory, and then that theory will either stand or fall on the evidence of future experiments.
Because technology might change in the future.
Yes, new evidence or developments in the future can cause a scientific theory to be revised or even discarded. As our understanding of the world grows and advances, theories must evolve to fit the new information. This process is a fundamental part of the scientific method.
Creating a fortune teller that accurately predicts the future is not possible as there is no scientific evidence to support the ability to predict the future. It is important to approach fortune telling with skepticism and critical thinking.
There is no scientific evidence or credible theory to suggest that the world will explode or be filled with water in the foreseeable future. These scenarios are typically seen in movies and not based on real scientific knowledge.
Yes, in fact nothing in science is ever considered to be 100% without a doubt factual. Gravity is a prime example in the sense that we're not starting to question if gravity is even real because we can not observe it.
There is no credible historical evidence to suggest that George Washington was visited by people from the future. Claims of time travel are generally considered to be fictional and do not have scientific support.
There is no scientific evidence to suggest that abortion causes infertility. Abortion is a common medical procedure that does not typically impact a person's ability to conceive in the future.
No, pendulums do not have the ability to accurately predict future events. They are simply objects that swing back and forth due to gravity and momentum. Any claims of predicting the future using a pendulum are not supported by scientific evidence.
Never. Earth cannot implode. For its mass and composition, Earth is about as compressed as it will ever be.