You can't get Nick Jonas's personalized diabetes necklace because it isn't just for show - it tells others that he is a diabetic, and if he suddenly faints, people will know he is diabetic, and not just fainting for no apparent reason. Others aren't allowed to wear diabetes necklaces unless they are diabetic. Diabetic necklaces aren't just handed out - they are given to those who are truly diabetic.
Kids are not allowed to wear necklaces at school for safety reasons. Necklaces can pose a choking hazard if they break or get caught on something while children are playing or running around. To prevent accidents, schools often have rules in place to limit the wearing of jewelry, including necklaces.
typically, they are not allowed to ... but they can if they are attached to a person first
Via IV, sure. Or sucrose, depending on the situation.
No. Any necklaces or watches etc. will be asked to be taken of by the reffere running the game. You are allowed to bring electronics just not on the court. Llama
You not allow patient leave with catheter in bladder.
According to the jeweler the necklace was worth 40,000 francs; but they could have it for 36,000 francs; he would buy it back for 34,000 - obviously it wasn't really worth the original 40,000 & he hadn't been able to sell it.
to make a gold necklace you need to get a gold bar and have a necklace mould which you can get from any crafting shop within Runscape (one is located in al-kalhid if you don't know where any are) you then use the gold bar on the furnace and you will be allowed to select to make a gold necklace. also if you wish to add gems you must also have the gem in your invintory as you use the gold bar on the furnace.
You are allowed -- that is called fan fiction -- but you cannot publish it or try to make any sort of money from it. See the attached link.
The Mexican train is a domino with two doubles on it, and another domino attached which a player is allowed to lay down at the start of the game of dominos. Anyone is allowed to play on it.
Sure is. Below are the legal arguments which prove that Lindsay Lohan is being falsely accused of stealing a necklace: The Associated Press reported "Sofia Kaman said she waited a day to report the necklace stolen because Lohan had told her she would return the next day to purchase a ring. The actress never returned. The first time Kaman saw Lohan since the Jan. 22 store visit was Friday. Kaman says she did not have any agreement with Lohan allowing her to leave the store with the necklace." According to Sofia Kaman's testimony, she never suspected that Lohan stole the necklace at all on the day Lohan is alleged to have taken it or she should not have allowed Lohan to leave the store with the necklace on or should have reported to the police right after Lohan left the store. It was TACIT AGREEMENT on Kaman's part that Lohan could leave the store with the unpaid necklace since Kaman testified that she did not report to the police right away because Lohan told her she would return the next day to purchase a ring. It is totally inappropriate for Kaman to falsely accuse Lohan of stealing the necklace when she had tacitly allowed her to leave the store with it based on the promise that she would return to the store to buy a ring. It is wrong that the store management would falsely accuse her of stealing the necklace she was tacitly allowed to leave the store with based on her promise of returning to buy a ring.
There are pet-friendly hotels in Wisconsin Dells, WI. See the attached link for more information.