Sure. Loads of people have both faith in a higher power and faith that science is an accurate way to explore the universe that higher power created.
Belief in a God does not mean science is wrong - it might tell you that some of the ways science gets used are wrong (like using science to make chemical weapons or something) but it doesn't mean that science itself is a bad thing.
The people who believe that science itself is bad are people who are literalists - they believe that some religious doctrines (like The Bible) which directly contradict observable reality (science) are right, and that anything which seems to contradict these doctrines is wrong - no matter how good the proof is that it's real. This is seen as a "test of faith", can you disbelieve the evidence of your eyes in favor of the instructions you believe come from God.
Scientists with faith often feel that science is a way to get closer to God, by studying the universe God made with the minds & curiosity God gave them.
The Coordination of Science and Religion (COSAR) with the Truth of Reality is exquisitely embedded throughout The Urantia Book. The Urantia Papers emphasize that religion and science are not two antagonistic views of reality; they are views of two aspects of reality, those aspects being the personal and impersonal natures of God. The bumper sticker you may have seen lately "In the Beginning, God Created Evolution" demonstrates the increasing consciousness of our Cosmic Citizenship and a healthy respect for science (COSAR expressed on a bumper sticker). The COSAR Principle as described in Up Close and Personal with The Urantia Book - Expanded Edition addresses this with a great degree of satisfaction.
The popes curiosity
No. They can easily coexist, in perfect harmony, once the scope and limitations of each are acknowledged.
They can live peacefully if the fanatics stick to their own business. Easy as that
albert Einstein said religion without science is blind and science without religion is lame the seeming opposites can coexist because personality basis for existence and consciousness is moral foundation G PADMANABHAN
Many thinkers throughout history have believed that science and religion are related, including Albert Einstein, who stated that science without religion is lame, and religion without science is blind. Additionally, figures like Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton viewed their scientific work as a way to understand the divine. In contemporary discussions, some theologians and scientists advocate for a dialogue between the two fields, suggesting they can coexist and enrich one another.
Boyle viewed religion as essential to a well-ordered society and believed that science and religion could coexist harmoniously. He supported the idea that studying the natural world could lead to a deeper understanding and appreciation of God's creation. Boyle's work in both science and theology reflected his belief in the compatibility of faith and reason.
they try to be impartial
John Lightfoot was an Irish philosopher and Anglican bishop known for his attempts to reconcile science and religion. He believed that both realms could coexist peacefully and sought to find common ground between the two disciplines.
Religion is not a science.
R. C. Wallace has written: 'Science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion, science and the modern world' -- subject(s): Religion and science
Albert Einstein said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind" in his 1954 essay "Science and Religion." In the essay, he emphasized the importance of understanding and integrating both science and religion for a more holistic view of the world.
; The quote is Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. : Albert Einstein, "Science, Philosophy and Religion: a Symposium", 1941More quotes of Albert Einstein; see link "Quotes Albert Einstein" on left.