To begin with, the curfew creates a huge problem for kids who have to stay out late for a school related activity or something of that nature. They are then forced to drive home and hope that a cop will believe their story. If not, they are forced to pay a ticket for breaking the law. So by this law, teens feel like criminals even though they did not choose to be out so late. I myself, have returned home after curfew for countless school related dances, sporting events, etc... This in itself is not right, and needs to be changed soon. A student would never consider quitting a sport or activity just because they could get a ticket on their way home, Dropping these school related events is not a choice, so a new alternative needs to be put into place. Another reason why the curfew is flawed is the reason it was established in the first place, to prevent crime. But this law has done little, if not nothing to decrease the amount of crime. The amount of crimes throughout the city has remained at a relatively constant rate since the curfew was put into effect. This is in part because of the thinking process associated with teenagers. Just because they aren't allowed to be out as late is not going to stop them from participating in illegal activities. They choose to either do it earlier and get home on time, or simply stay out past the curfew and risk getting caught (which is a possibility even if the curfew is not in effect). Also, the majority of crimes committed throughout the city happens to be by, what do you know, adults. The crimes committed by adults also happen to be more serious or dangerous since they have access to more resources and supplies. Apparently the city should be focusing on preventing crime from happening in the first place instead of trying to get kids home earlier. Next, a curfew gives teens yet another reason to dislike the authorities. Most teens hate the police force anyway, so why should we be given another reason. With this hate, teens are less likely to report a crime or give helpful information which in turn makes the community more dangerous. Teenagers would also most likely begin to have more respect for the law, and understand why it was put into effect in the first place. To begin with, the curfew creates a huge problem for kids who have to stay out late for a school related activity or something of that nature. They are then forced to drive home and hope that a cop will believe their story. If not, they are forced to pay a ticket for breaking the law. So by this law, teens feel like criminals even though they did not choose to be out so late. I myself, have returned home after curfew for countless school related dances, sporting events, etc... This in itself is not right, and needs to be changed soon. A student would never consider quitting a sport or activity just because they could get a ticket on their way home, Dropping these school related events is not a choice, so a new alternative needs to be put into place. Another reason why the curfew is flawed is the reason it was established in the first place, to prevent crime. But this law has done little, if not nothing to decrease the amount of crime. The amount of crimes throughout the city has remained at a relatively constant rate since the curfew was put into effect. This is in part because of the thinking process associated with teenagers. Just because they aren't allowed to be out as late is not going to stop them from participating in illegal activities. They choose to either do it earlier and get home on time, or simply stay out past the curfew and risk getting caught (which is a possibility even if the curfew is not in effect). Also, the majority of crimes committed throughout the city happens to be by, what do you know, adults. The crimes committed by adults also happen to be more serious or dangerous since they have access to more resources and supplies. Apparently the city should be focusing on preventing crime from happening in the first place instead of trying to get kids home earlier. Next, a curfew gives teens yet another reason to dislike the authorities. Most teens hate the police force anyway, so why should we be given another reason. With this hate, teens are less likely to report a crime or give helpful information which in turn makes the community more dangerous. Teenagers would also most likely begin to have more respect for the law, and understand why it was put into effect in the first place.
pros and cons of physiocrats
what were the pros and cons for the nulification
pros an cons of the Oregon trail
pros are + and cons are-
pros: goodness cons: badness
PROS CONS ----------------------------------------------------- Pros: Entertaining Cons: Mental conditions can be caused, Adicition, Expensive.
Cons? What Cons?
What are the pros and cons of transformational leadership?
what are the pros and cons of being an architect
pros= nothing cons=everything
pros and cons about mercantilist and physiocrats
Usually there are no pros or cons.