0
Ancient Rome
Ancient Rome was a civilization that started as a small community in the Italian Peninsula around 10th century BC. Located in the city of Rome, it became one of the largest and most powerful empires of the ancient world.
6,726 Questions
How often were chariot races held?
At least 5,000 to 8,000 years. The ancient people of Egypt, Rome, Greece, China all had chariots.
What is the most famous artifact from ancient Rome?
Artifacts are anything from the past, usually the ancient past. In Rome's case there are many, many artifacts, beginning with the buildings such as the Pantheon and the Colosseum, and graduating downward to items such as pottery, glass, jewelry, weapons and military armor, written records and vast hordes of coins from various eras that have been discovered.
What happened to some roman babies?
it's easy Roman babies were killed if the Father hadent been in the army for more than 25 years.
Roman god feast on 25 December?
Saturn. The 25th of December was called Saturnalia in pre-Christian times.
The ruling tribe of Rome before Patricians?
The Particians were not a tribe but the upper class. They were preceded by kings.
Here is a list. Note that the original names of the Roman roads in Britain are not known due to the lack of written sources. The names in current use were chosen in the early Midle Ages and are derived from the Welsh or Anglo-Saxon language.
A1034/1079Brough-York > Cade's Road
A59 York to A1(M) > Dere Street
B4000 Newbury to Stratton, Swindon,A419 Stratton, Swindon to Cirencester, A417 Cirencester to Gloucester > Ermine Way
A10 London-Royston;A1198Royston-Huntingdon; A15Lincoln-Broughton; A1034/1079Brough-York > Ermine Street
A1122 Downham Market-Swaffham.> Fen Causeway
A37 Ilchester-Shepton Mallet; A429 Cirencester-Halford; B4455 Halford-High Cross; A46 Leicester-Lincoln > Fosse Way
A38 Lichfield-Derby > Icknield/Ryknild Street
A470, A487, A470, A483 > Sarn Helen
A3 Newington-Clapham; A24 Clapham-Ewell; A29 Rowhook-Pulborough; A285 Halnaker-Chichester > Stane Street; London toChichester(Noviomagus)
B1256 Bishop's Stortford-Braintree;A120Braintree-Colchester > Stane Street; Braughing to Colchester(Camulodunum)
B2068 from the M20 motorway to Canterbury > Stone Street
A2 Faversham-Gillingham; A207Crayford-Blackheath; A5 London-Wroxeter (except bypasses) > Watling Street
How were the senators and tribunes chosen in ancient Rome by?
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
The tribunes were chosen by a vote. The senators, well, that 's a different story as they could be chosen in a few ways. If a man were elected quaestor or tribune, he automatically had a seat in the senate. These were the only "elected" senators even though they were not directly chosen for the senate, but for other positions. A man could apply for entrance in the senate and if he met the qualifications of family and wealth he was in. A third way to be chosen for the senate was by direct appointment by a consul, dictator or emperor. As is obvious, the ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates.
Was every class reprsented in the roman republic?
The Romans did not have a representative democracy. People did not elect representatives like congressmen, senators, or MPs. They elected the executive officers of state instead. All adult male Roman citizens had the right to vote.
What did a group of 300 men form in roman republic?
At one time this was the membership of the Senate.
What were the most famous ancient roman sports?
The ancient Romans were particularly fond of gladiatorial games. There were different levels and types of gladiators who would pit their skills against each other in the Arena.
What is the significance of missionaries in Ancient Rome?
There is no significance to missionaries because they didn't exist. The whole of Europe was Catholic and travel outside of Europe didn't happen until the late 1400's so people didn't need missionaries to convert people.
___
Not all of Europe was Christian. Missionaries were sent out by the Church to convert the remaining areas like pockets in Scandanavia. John of Montecorvino went to China and established a mission in Peking in the early 1300's.
How many people could fit in a Roman Domus?
It depended on the size of the villa and its purpose. Some were holiday homes of the urban rich and could be the size of a mansion. Some were the farmsteads of the owners of large rural estates and included a retinue of servants/slaves and peasants in the actual complex. Some were imperial residences. Emperor Hadrian's villa was like a mini town and could host 100s of people.
Did the Romans treat the people they conqured fairly?
Rome treated conquered people generously because Rome knew the people would be more loyal to the government if well treatedRomans knew that conquered people would be more loyal to the government if well treated.
The Romans were tolerant of other people's beliefs and they allowed "foreign" religions as long as those religions or practices were not treasonous or were not detrimental to the empire in some way.
Answer 2
Because the Jews agreed to live by Roman rule.
The Romans did not generally object to the religious beliefs of their subject peoples provided the latter also observed Roman religious practices. Jews and Christians of course refused to do this.
The Romans never forced their religious beliefs on any people they subjected. On the contrary, they often embraced religious practices and even gods from other religions if they liked the look of them. You must remember that the Christians (and later, the Muslims) have been the only believers in history to hold that their religion is superior to anyone else's AND translated that conviction into converting others and suppressing their original beliefs .
So by our standards, the Romans were religiously tolerant. By their own standards, it wouldn't even enter their minds to suppress a local religion unless its beliefs brought the locals in direct conflict with their political or strategic interests.
The Romans were actually very tolerant of "foreign" and "different" religions.
They also made a differentiation be religions (practiced since antiquity) and cults (new beliefs). The Jewish religion was recognized as being practiced even before Rome existed and was thus granted an exception for they "strange" refusal to sacrifice to the Emperor. Cults (e.g. the new Christianity) could not be granted such an exception and if their followers were to refuse to sacrifice to the Emperor then they would be persecuted to attempt to force them to sacrifice.
In Roman times, pumping water wasn't as easy as it is today, so they relied on gravity to bring the water in. That meant they had to find a source that was higher than where they wanted the water delivered to, and then that they had to build the aqueduct at a steady slope all the way from the source to its destination.
Just a small addition to your question: all Roman aqueducts were NOT raised 50 feet or any other amount of feet off the ground. It is estimated that 80% of the aqueducts were underground. Of the 260 miles in the system, only 30 miles were arched above the ground.
How did you become a priest in ancient rome?
You merely had to be appointed a priest to be a priest. The priesthood in ancient Rome was not the same as our present day priesthood. All it generally entailed was offering a sacrifice and any male Roman could do this. Being a pried was usually an honorific position with minimal duties.
Originally it was only the patricians who could be priests. Later, plebeians were given access to the priesthoods. Originally the priesthoods were extremely important as the very early Roman state was based on religion. The priesthoods were key to the patricians having superior status. As the state became more and more secular, this importance faded.
What was the arch of Augustus made out of?
Stone and clay was used and packed to form the arch of Augustus.
Their were two.
What is it like when the gladiators are underneath the arena?
It depends on the arena. Most arenas or amphitheatres had nothing under them. There were separate holding areas under the seats for the gladiators, animals, prisoners, etc. However the Colosseum in Rome, had a "basement" under the wooden floor, and down there were the holding cells for the prisoners, gladiators and animals. It also had an elevator system and a storage area for plants and scenery that enhanced the events on the main floor.
Why did the Spartans have 2 kings?
Sparta ran on a system of democracy, therefore it had two kings who shared responsibilities. It is evident from Plutarch's; "Life of Lycurgus", that a lawgiver known by the name of Lycurgus derived the Spartan laws from the oracle at Delphi, which outlined how Sparta was to function. Within this Delphic Oracle it was stated that Sparta was to have two kings.
Sparta did not have a system of Democracy the spartan government was a Oligarchy: form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people. These people could be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, education, corporate, or military control. Such states are often controlled by a few prominent families who typically pass their influence from one generation to the next, but inheritance is not a necessary condition for the application of this term. almost always Oligarcy oligarchies have been tyrannical (relying on public obedience and/or oppression to exist) or relatively benign. Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as a synonym for rule by the rich.
The state was ruled by two hereditary kings of the Agiad and Eurypontid families, both supposedly descendants of Heracles and equal in authority, so that one could not act against the power and political enactments of his colleague.
The duties of the kings were primarily religious, judicial, and military. They were the chief priests of the state and also maintained communication with the Delphian sanctuary, which always exercised great authority in Spartan politics. In the time of Herodotus, about 450 BC, their judicial functions had been restricted to cases dealing with heiresses, adoptions and the public roads. Aristotle describes the kingship at Sparta as "a kind of unlimited and perpetual generalship" while Isocrates refers to the Spartans as "subject to an oligarchy at home, to a kingship on campaign"
Civil and criminal cases were decided by a group of officials known as the ephors, as well as a council of elders known as the Gerousia. The Gerousia consisted of 28 elders over the age of 60, elected for life and usually part of the royal households, and the two kings.[38] High state policy decisions were discussed by this council who could then propose action alternatives to the Damos, the collective body of Spartan citizenry, who would select one of the alternatives by voting.
The royal prerogatives were curtailed over time. Dating from the period of the Persian wars, the king lost the right to declare war and was accompanied in the field by two ephors. He was supplanted also by the ephors in the control of foreign policy. Over time, the kings became mere figureheads except in their capacity as generals. Real power was transferred to the ephors and to the Gerousia.
The origins of the powers exercised by the assembly of the citizens are virtually unknown because of the lack of historical documentation and Spartan state secrecy.
