How much carbon dioxide is burned per year?
Every 100 pounds of wood contains approximately 44 pounds of carbon. When burned, this carbon combines with oxygen (some in the wood and some from the air) to produce about 163 pounds carbon dioxide.
Do people affect the amount of air pollution they create and therefore contribute to global warming?
Absolutely! Every action we do is linked to our surroundings. In developed countries we are using more and more energy doing things like heating our homes, running our cars, using electricity, etc. This increased demand for energy creates more air pollution, altering the atmospheric cycle and warming the earth faster than normal. Earth will eventually warm up by its own and the ice will melt, but we are speeding up this process unnaturally.
Why is water security a global issue?
Water Security is the protection of adequate water supplies for food, fiber, industrial, and residential needs for expanding populations, which requires maximizing water-use efficiency, developing new supplies, and protecting water reserves in event of scarcity due to natural, manmade, or technological hazards.
Which comes first history or science?
No. Not always (but usually), sometimes the process of discovery can be reversed. The steam engine is one example. The only thing the inventors of the steam engine knew was that steam from boiling water could move the engine.
What term do you use when the atmosphere keeps the planet warm?
The greenhouse effect. Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane trap infrared heat rising from the surface of the earth. This heat warms the atmosphere and also the earth again.
Which process does not release carbon dioxide to the atmosphere?
Photosynthesis is a process that does not release carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Instead, during photosynthesis, plants absorb carbon dioxide from the environment and convert it into oxygen through a series of chemical reactions.
How could cutting down trees lead to the build up of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?
Trees absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere during photosynthesis. When trees are cut down and not replaced, this carbon dioxide is no longer absorbed, leading to an increase in its levels in the atmosphere. Additionally, when trees are burnt or decompose, the stored carbon is released back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide.
How much have sea levels risen since 1992?
Sea levels have risen approximately 3.6 inches (9.1 cm) globally since 1992, as measured by satellite data. This rise is primarily due to the melting of glaciers and ice caps and the thermal expansion of seawater caused by global warming.
On average less than 1%. It is estimated that volcanoes emit on average 200 million tonnes of CO2 a year. This includes all volcanoes, hot springs and and undersea hydrothermal vents. Humans emit 26 billion tonnes (2003) a year by burning fossil fuels. The gas burnt onsite at oil wells in gas flares accounts for more CO2 emissions than all volcanoes put together.
How do the lack of trees contribute to global warming?
Trees help to reduce global warming by 'cleaning the air'.
Here's how: * A gas that helps to cause global warming is carbon dioxide. * Trees 'breathe' just like we do except when they breathe they take in carbon dioxide not oxygen. * When a tree breathes out it breathes out oxygen. * This is then breathed in by a human. * Carbon dioxide is breathed out the the human... * ...and breathed in by the tree... * This carries on continuously. Some trees have been growing in tropical rainforests like the Amazon Basin for hundreds of years. They store almost half their weight in carbon. So trees help reduce global warming in a way, but with people producing so much extra carbon dioxide global warming is happening. Trees probably have other effects on the environment and global warming, but I only know what is above. Hope it helps :) Yes, living trees breathe in carbon dioxide. But when they die, they ROT, and when they rot, all the carbon they stored over the years will be oxidized and released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. Well, not ALL of the carbon. Some part of it will be transferred to the soil. But in places like the Amazon Rain Forest, the soil is too thin to hold much carbon, so very little goes into the soil and what little does is rapidly released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. On the other hand, if, instead of allowing trees to die and rot, we were to HARVEST the trees, turn them into lumber, and treat them to prevent rot, the carbon therein would be sequestered (prevented from oxidizing into the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere) almost indefinitely.
Why does the sea level rise after tsunami?
As the water recedes back into the ocean, it doesn't just go straight back out to deep waters. It stays closer to the coast, which causes the rise of ocean levels.
+++
Sorry, but that is wrong. A tsunami is a wave and once the water it has flung onto land has flowed back to the sea, sea-level is as it was. In fact, however devastating the tsunami, the volume of water it moves is so small compared to world-wide ocean volume, its effect on sea-level is too all intents and purposes, non-existent.
Water cannot behave as you say anyway!
One very important point. The section heading is "Global Warming, Oceans and Seas". Most, and certainly the most destructive, Tsunami have nothing to do with climate or sea-level change.
What is the critical difference between today's global warming and Eath's previous climate changes?
Why are the ice sheets in Greenland melting?
The Greenland ice SHEET is melting at an accelerating rate, now over 100 cubic kilometers per year, which contributes about 0.35mm by itself to sea level rise each year.
Source:
Ramillien, G., A. Lombard, A. Cazenave, E. R. Ivins, M. Llubes, F. Remy, and R. Biancale (2006), Interannual variations of the mass balance of the Antarctica and Greenland ice sheets from GRACE, Global Planet.Change, 53(3), 198-208, doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.06.003.
What are the effects of global warming ozone depletion and acid rain?
The greenhouse effect is a natural phenomenom by which greenhouse gases keep the earth at a comfortable level suitable for human existence. This occurs when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are around their long-term level of 260 to 280 parts per million (ppm). The enhanced greenhouse effect, which is what we usually mean when we just talk about the greenhouse effect, results when atmospheric carbon dioxide levels rise, as they have done to the present level of over 380 ppm. This results in global warming and therefore climate change. This will result in widespread species extinction, coastal inundation and, in the longer term, great economic loss.
Ozone depletion is specifically the reduction in levels of the ozone gas in the upper atmosphere and results from the use of CFC gases, which are no longer permitted to be manufactured for industrial use. The world's ozone layer is gradually recovering, although there is also a natural, seasonal cycle of depletion and recovery. The risk of ozone depletion was that too much ultraviolet radiation would reach the earth's surface, resulting in high levels of skin cancer.
Industrial processes can result in slightly acidic rain as a result of high levels of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide pollution. Sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides dissolve very easily in water and can be carried very far in the wind and become part of the rain, sleet, snow, and fog that we experience on certain days. Acid rain can cause health problems, damage to crops and damage to buildings and infrastructure.
What meen global listening discrete explain whit exampel?
Global listening in communication refers to paying attention to the overall message and context of a conversation, rather than just focusing on individual words or phrases. This involves understanding the nuances of tone, body language, and cultural background. For example, if someone says they are "fine" but their body language suggests otherwise, global listening would involve recognizing the discrepancy and exploring further to understand the real feelings behind the words.
Has the IPCC been wrong before?
Unfortunately the IPCC's record is far from good when it comes to getting things right.
The most notable case was the so-called Himalaya-Gate affair, when the organisation released an alarmist report in 2007, claiming that the Himalyan glacier will have melted by 2035. As it transpired the report was without any scientific basis and was based on a report an IPCC employee ("expert reviewer" Murari Lal) had read in the New Scientist magazine. The New Scientist article itself was drawn up from a short telephone call with an obscure Indian scientist called Syed Hasnain, who it transpired had absolutely no scientific evidence to support his claim.
The report (printed in 1999) had gone unnoticed until 2005, when without the necessary scrutiny, it was used by the WWF as a campigning tool to prove that glaciers were melting. It was then picked up without any scrutiny or peer review by Lal and the IPCC as they prepared their 2007 report.
Another faux-pas of the IPCC was Amazon-Gate when the IPCC claimed that up to 40% of the rain forests in the Amazon were at risk from global warming and would likely be replaced by "tropical savannas" if temperatures continued to rise.
The scientific-looking report, on which this claim was based, was a non-peer reviewed article for the WWF, by an Australian policy analyst and a freelance journalist for the Guardian newspaper (not even experts let alone scientists!).
The IPCC was forced to withdraw it's 2007 prediction that sea levels would rise by 18-59 cm over the course of this century due to "two technical errors" in it's calculations.
What scandals has the IPCC been part of?
The IPCC has also been involved in a number of scandals including:
Climate-Gate - e-mails obtained from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia suggested that facts inconvenient to the global warming case were being deliberately hidden/obscured.
Himalaya-Gate - Alarmist report by the IPCC that the Himalyan glacier will have melted by 2035. As it transpired the report was without any scientific basis.
Amazon-Gate - The IPCC claimed that up to 40% of the rain forests in the Amazon were at risk from global warming and would likely be replaced by "tropical savannas" if temperatures continued to rise.
The scientific-looking report, on which this claim was based, was a non-peer reviewed article for the WWF, by an Australian policy analyst and a freelance journalist for the Guardian newspaper (not even experts let alone scientists!).
But the biggest scandal to date is the IPCC's claim, made in 1995, that it had found "a "discernible human influence" on the earth's changing climate. The claim was inserted by the report's lead author, Ben Santer of the Lawrence Livermore government laboratory, after the IPCC's consulting scientists had agreed a draft that specifically said no such "human fingerprint" had been found.
Due to this deliberate reversal of the report's findings, Santer also altered the trajectory of every IPCC document since. He argued that the alteration that it was justified based on two of his own studies, which "cherry-picked" the earth's temperature record from 1963-1987, deliberately ignoring temperatures that didn't confirm the Greenhouse theory. Thus the "discernible human influence" as claimed by the IPCC remains without scientific support to this day.
Why the level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is rising?
The level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is rising as the gases responsible are produced without any attempt to reduce the levels. The gases such as Methane, water vapors, Carbon dioxide ( CO2 ), Nitrous Oxide and especially chloroflurocarbons ( CFCs ) are increasing day by day as it is used in manufacturing many products. If such trend continues it may result in the huge climatic changes which may result in mass deaths due to extreme weather conditions and diseases caused by such gases
Do electric cars result in zero carbon dioxide emissions?
If electric cars are charged with renewable energy, that is, from wind, water, solar etc, then, yes, they have practically zero carbon dioxide emissions.
However, most electricity today is generated largely from burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas), so, due to transmission losses, purely electric cars may result in more carbon dioxide emissions than petroleum fueled cars ... it's just that the emissions are shifted from the car itself to the location of the power plant used to charge it.
Is the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide currently decreasing due to human activities?
No, the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide is increasing due to human activities such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation. This leads to the trapping of heat in the atmosphere, contributing to global warming and climate change.
Deforestation of the rainforests destroyed trees that used to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. This allows CO2 levels to build up in the atmosphere. Greenhouse gases cause the greenhouse effect, keeping the earth warm. Because of deforestation and man's burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) in industry, transport and the generation of electricity, levels of CO2 in the air are rising, causing global warming.
How long has the greenhouse effect been going on for?
What are the sources of lead in the atmosphere?
Until relatively recently, lead was added to petrol to raise its octane rating. After decades of cars emitting this into our atmosphere, scientists began to find high levels of lead in the air of our cities and along major traffic arteries. Even after lead is no longer added to fuel, the lead remains in our urban environment and re-enters the atmosphere when disturbed.
Why is global warming impossible?
If global warming were impossible, the world would be at least 30 degrees Celsius colder than it is today. One thing research scientists and global warming denialists do agree on is that greenhouse gases keep the earth at a comfortable temperature suitable for human habitation. So, global warming is not only possible, but necessary. And just as it is possible to keep the world at a temperature suitable for the maintenance of the world's current biodiversity and human existence, so also it is possible to raise the world's temperature, simply by adding new carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. That is what scientists say is happening now.
Also, let's make sure we separate the concept of the greenhouse effect and the concept of global warming. The greenhouse effect is the process by which greenhouse gasses, such as carbon dioxide, insulate the earth, causing more of the earth's reflected heat to be captured instead of drifting off into space. Global warming is the theory that present-day increases of atmospheric carbon dioxide are causing the earth's temperature to permanently increase.
The greenhouse effect is a well know fact, with many observable examples of where it has exhibited itself (ie, Venus). Scientists who study the subject know that the greenhouse effect is the process of confining the energy from the sun that get radiated back out at longer wavelengths. What inhibits the cooling by radiation is the material in the atmosphere that absorbs energy. It turns out that water is one of those and, it is very important. If it wasn't, your microwave wouldn't heat your coffee. But, increased warming increases water vapor and that makes everything even worse, and not be a little bit. NASA satellite imagery has been reporting water vapor distribution in the atmosphere for decades. The NASA web site summarizes a study on this saying, " Increasing water vapor leads to warmer temperatures, which causes more water vapor to be absorbed into the air. Warming and water absorption increase in a spiraling cycle. " See http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/vapor_warming.html There are an infinite number of ways that you can conjecture what might be true, but with real scientific research, the job is to whittle all those "might cause" ideas down to one. That is an advantage science has.