P. (Palanisamy) Sathasivam has been the Chief Justice of the Indian Supreme Court since July 19, 2013.
The Hague, Netherlanlands
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations (UN). It was established in June 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations and began work in April 1946. The seat of the Court is at the Peace Palace in The Hague (Netherlands). Of the six principal organs of the United Nations, it is the only one not located in New York (United States of America). It can have sittings in other locations though.
The Hague, The Netherlands.
According to new legislation they increased from 26(25+1) to 31 judges. i.e 1 chief justice of India and 30 judges.
Justice S.H.Kapadia Justice K G Balakrishnan, from Keral is a present Chief Justice of Supreme Court Of India .He is the first-ever Dalit to occupy the coveted post after replacing Chief Justice Y K Sabharwal who retired on January 14, 2007. Hon'ble Balakrishnan, is 37th Chief Justice, and has a tenure of three years and four months, till May 12, 2010, the day he retires. Chief Justice Sabharwal had a tenure of 14 months while his predecessor Justice R C Lahoti had a 17 month stint.
The email address is
Justice Fathima Beevi was the first female judge of the Supreme Court of India whose tenure lasted from October 6 1989 to April 29, 1992.
Harilal J. Kania is the correct
SEPTEMBER 13, 2011If Party-in-Person is a Senior Citizen, the case to be speedily disposed by High Courtsby samrajyam srinivasa rao
It is highly commendable that Janab Nisar Ahmad Kakru, Hon. Chief Justice of Andhra Pradesh High Court, Hyderabad made a clarion call to the Hon. Judges after unfurling the National Flag on 65th Independence Day at A.P. High Court to further speed up the process of hearing cases to ensure that justice is delivered with all the speed at their command. In this context, I would like to bring to the kind notice of the Hon. Chief Justice that one of the prime reasons for the procrastination in the dispensation of justice with a flickering hope that this issue will be given all the importance it deserves and the Chief Justice will take a serious notice of this for immediate remedial action. My own bitter experience narrated hereunder in greater detail about the inherent defect in the existing system which is mainly responsible for the abnormal delays occurring in the disposal of cases in the High Court .
I am 72 years old, a chronic diabetic having undergone heart surgery in Delhi in 2003. I have filed a Writ Petition No.30687 / 10 in A.P. High Court as a Party-in-Person. In the lower court, it has taken more than eight years for the disposal of the case for the acquittal of the vendor of the charge of selling Govt. assigned land. Hon. Justice Shri Nooti Ramamohana Rao was also convinced with my pleadings that my house site admeasuring 208 sq.yd was not a Govt. assigned land when it was purchased and duly Registered by the Sub-Registrar (East), Hyderabad in December, 1984 as the MRO has informed the Sub-Registar that it was Govt. assigned land after a long gap of 7 years in August, 1991. The District Registrar has stated in his sworn Affidavit that even the basic registers maintained in the year 1985 also showed that it was wet land and not a Govt. land. However, it has been acquired by the A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corporation Ltd in 2007 without issuing even a mandatory notice to the purchaser. If the State itself becomes a "predator", to whom else the aggrieved can approach for the redress of his grievance except the High Court? The Counsel for A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corpn Ltd; Shri J. Prabhakar under the aforesaid circumstances has ultimately agreed in the open court during the 'final hearing' for the restoration of the site to me as it is still lying vacant as the Corpn. did not have plans to take up construction there. Whereupon, the Hon. Justice in the open court directed me and Shri Mallesh, Tahsildar of A.P. Rajiv Swagruha Corpn Ltd on 15-7-11 to locate my plot with the help of MRO; Hayathnagar and after marking the boundaries compliance to be reported back to him. Accordingly, his instructions were carried out and informed the same to the Hon. Judge when the case came up for next hearing on 22-7-11.
When the case has almost reached an end with only the judgment is to be delivered, it has been suddenly transferred to another Court No.23 presided by Hon. Justice Shri Ramesh Ranganathan as per the strict procedure in vogue i.e rotation of cases at every two months interval with the case back to square one. Although the case has been listed in his Court for "final hearing" again on 08-8-11, 16-8-11, 17-8-11, 19-8-11 and 26-8-11 he had expressed his inability to take it up as he curtly told that he is overburdened with 1400 admission cases and can't spare his time for "final hearing" cases despite repeated appeals..
It may therefore be seen from the above sequential events that the decision arrived at by the previous Hon. Judge has already been set in motion and when the judgment is awaited, the case has been shifted to my rude shock to another Judge to be heard by him afresh. In the intervening period of 8 months, four Judges have handled this case with no end in sight. To my misfortune, I am being tossed from one bench/court to the other like a shuttlecock. This is one of the real factors for piling-up of cases in the High Court as the entire exercise goes on and on without giving a chance to the judges to arrive at a logical conclusion.
To remedy the present ailing system, it is strongly felt that a brief report on the stage of the case is to be obtained from Judges and cases at the final stage retained with the same judge as he is fully conversant with the case instead of transferring the cases purely as a mechanical adherence to the so called "Rule Book" and adopt a pragmatic approach..
Jodimetla Village, Warangal Highway
Ghatkesar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Andhra Pradesh, Pin Code:-500088
Leave a Comment·
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Titan by The Theme Foundry.
The fact of the matter is that the ICJ cannot actually ensure state compliance. The ICJ simply determines whether or not any violation of a treaty between two or more nation states has been violated. The ICJ does not have any means of enforcing the law. In fact, international law is enforced primarily by the Security Council.
Chief Justice Of India must not be a member of Parliament due to following reasons;-
1.The doctrine of indepedent Judiciary system will not exist.It will be against the spirit of our Present Indan Constitution.
2.In such cases every judgment will be inflated by the Politicians.
3.The faith of public in Indian Judiciary will certainly vanish.
4.It will be against the principal of Natural Justice.
Daulat Raj Munot,
Ex-President,GOoovrnment college Jalore.
Ex-Manager,State Bank Of Bikaner And Jaipur.
It decides, in accordance with international law, disputes of a legal nature that are submitted to it by States (jurisdiction in contentious cases)
rules on international disputes A+
To dive the sense of security. Laws are made to force people to be good, because individuals are more controlled more by there passion and education alone can't make them good, so laws were created to scare people in being 'good'.
because law shows us right direction and without law we cannot judge what is true or wrong.
laws keep order and peace. if there was no laws there would be chaos.
No Court is higher than the current Supreme Court.
However, in older cases, the "Supreme Court" it refers to may be the equivalent of the current "High Court", as it was called then. In that case the Court of Appeal and Privy Council were higher authority.
At present , there are 29 judges including chief justice of india Hon'ble Mr. Justice Altamas Kabir
Justice S. H. Kapadia
He was the former Chief Justice. At present Justice Altamas Kabir is the CJI (Chief Justice of India).
Iglesia ni Cristo
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.H. Kapadia
Chief Justice of India
Appointed as the Chief Justice of India in the forenoon of 12.05.2010
has retired , the current CJI is Justice S. H. Kapadia
The present CJI is Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar and is the 44th CJI since January 1950, the year the constitution came into effect and the supreme court came into being. He succeeded Justice T.S. Thakur on 4 January 2017 and will remain in office till 28 August 2017, the day he completes 65 years of age.
Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada, pursuant to section 9(2) of the Supreme Court Act, are appointed until they reach the age of seventy-five. A justice of the Supreme Court may also be removed by the Governor General for misconduct, upon resolutions of both the appointed Senate and the elected House of Commons.