Political Theory

Rajeev Gandhi

bye

The earlier notions of power you might ask are purely unconventional.If one thinks back to Julius Cesar, He wanted a dictatorship."ET TU BRUTE?" Translated " And you Brutus?" while Brutus betrayed Julius. Hitler also was a monster dictator. Now these are all international places, The reason we have our democracy in the usa is because of our founding fathers.The earlier notions of power have changed through people with a diversity of different up bringing wanting to be equal among men. Is this not what our constitution is founded on?Its all about how we evolved , to thinking smarter.

vote for their leader

The answer to this question goes to the very different views that each ideology has as to the proper role of government in society.

In general, a conservative ideology opposes intrusion of government into aspects of personal affairs and commerce. It adheres to the view that individuals know that which is best for themselves, and armed with adequate information, can make the best decisions as to their own lives.

Likewise, they believe that since government does not have the ability to create wealth, the only way that it can financially benefit groups of people is by confiscating wealth from other groups of people and redistributing it. This is done through the police power of the state; stated otherwise, by taxation. One way to look at welfare, or at least the financing of it, is as such a redistribution. Many conservatives believe that giving money through welfare weakens the drive and sullies the ambition of the recipient.

Many conservatives further believe that people are essentially good and giving, and that charity and other private auspices will care for those in need. This voluntarism is consistent with the fact that another person, however needy, does not have a right or claim to the property of another unless the latter chooses to offer help.

By and large, liberals argue that government should take a far more paternal approach and "take care" of those whom they deem to be in need. They tend to emphasize less the private property rights of individuals, and tend to emphasize more the view that people should be on a more level playing field, at least economically. They are far more willing to use the police powers of government to achieve those goals.

As to the government bailout of financial institutions, some conservative favor it and some oppose it, and the same is true of liberals. It can be viewed as a monumental injection of government into the private sector, and as a wrongful and artificial correction of what had been very poor business practices. The price that is paid for the bailout is a growing presence of the government in the financial marketplace--rather like the elephant getting its head into the tent.

There is no revolutionary nationalist. A person is either trying to overthrow the current government which makes them a revolutionary or he/she is a nationalist who supports the government. Nationalism is patriotic flag waving loyalty and devotion to a nation.

Nebraska and Kansas are similar in several ways, including their geographical location in the Midwestern United States and their agricultural economies. Both states are characterized by vast plains and a strong focus on farming, with crops like corn and wheat being significant to their economies. Additionally, they share cultural elements, such as a strong sense of community and a predominantly rural lifestyle. Both states also have a history of Native American heritage and pioneer settlement.

The main reason for having just two parties is the way the President is elected. In order to avoid having the House decide the election, one candidate has to get a majority of the electoral votes. With three parties or more parties splitting the votes, it would be really hard for one party to get this majority. So, the opposition tends to try to combine all the opposing views in order to get the majority votes.

The word "democracy" comes from the Greek meaning "rule by the people" or power to the people and the word "Republic" comes from the Latin meaning "of public affairs;" so they are so close in original source as to be hard to separate except by degrees.

Republics can vary in considerable ways in regards to how the country is run. Basically, as long as the country is not a Monarchy it is a Republic. Monarchies can have democratic elements and be more and more democratic to the point where the Monarch is a figurehead or performs the role of President in a Parliamentary form of government. One way this situation is described is as a "Constitutional Monarchy" wherein a written constitution describes limits on the monarchy and expresses powers to the citizenry.

People

Economic collapse due to failure of current monetary systems as well as gross national indebtedness largely due to the weight of entitlements and various other types of social programs. We are seeing this throughout Europe with the exception of Germany. America is well on it's way. This phenominon has the potential to vastly weaken national economies worldwide. The United States has the most to lose since our standard of living is higher than any other country. Instability bred by world wide economic collapse, or deep depression, will require the U.S to act militarily at a time it can least afford to due to it's own economic problems.

a fair and probability

personal and economic freedom

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were the men who developed the political ideology known as Communism.

There is no meaning to the phrase "marxist and engels." The words are incompatible with one another, because the word "marxist" is the type of person who espouses the philosophies of Karl Marx whereas the word "engels" is the name of the person who collaborated with Karl Marx in developing the historical and economic theories of communism.

setting eligibility criteria for politicians and selecting them based on their past performence.also they should have age limit as below 50 to stand in elections.. they should be physically fit enough atleast to run(?).. conduct tests like group exams..

If you are assigned to interview the president of Mauritania the following questions will help you to determine whether or not democracy exists there. You could ask about how elections are carried out. Another question would be able the rights of the citizens of the country. Also ask about the military and how they are used.

elizabeth

examples of negative duties

The word means to strip away or get rid of something, usually something for which there has been an economic, political, or financial relationship. For example, during the apartheid regime of South Africa, a number of countries (and corporations) decided to divest from doing any business with that country until apartheid ended; or certain individuals might divest from any stocks or other investments they had in corporations that pollute or damage the environment.

multiple branches of government

Study Island? XD

pluralist

Suffragettes were the members of a women's movement, in the late 19th early 20th century, seeking the right to vote. Until then only men held that right, aside from a few isolated situations.

Communism was and is a movement of the poor working class, seeking political and monetary control of governments, and businesses, worldwide.

a 11 year old in madras,oregon he's a good soccer player

Yes ! It is very illegal !