That may differ from a country to another, but in general if you were referring to vests, I don't think any military force supply that to regular privates, and in combat, soldiers have to find means to survive on their own.
In most cases wearing extra armor under your issued armor would be very uncomfortable and severely limit your movement. In the US Military, wearing aftermarket armor is prohibited due to the fact that it may not stand up to or meet military regulations.
Extra armor also will almost certainly be useless. Modern 1st-world militaries generally issue body armor designed to withstand the most likely threats that a soldier will face: primarily, fragmentation and blast. Extra armor above the standard amount will not increase the protection against those effects, as the existing standard armor is sufficient. Additional threats, such as direct hits from normal rifle fire, cannot be defeated by additional under-armor protection. Only ballistic plates can help with that, and even there, the protection is imperfect. No reasonable amount of anti-ballistic fibres can protect against direct modern rifle fire.
In most cases, soldiers are not allowed to wear extra body armor under their standard issue. The reason is that the military's standard issue body armor is designed to provide adequate protection, and wearing additional armor may hinder the soldier's mobility and increase the risk of overheating. However, there may be exceptions made for special operations forces or specific mission requirements.
They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.They wore their standard issue army boots or "caligae". For extra warmth they also wore woollen socks.
ww1 Britain standard issue was a Lee Enfield and German was a Gewehr 98 WW2 Britain standard issue was a new version of the Lee Enfield and German was a Karabiner 98K
Yes, a Soldier is given a clothing allowance for the purchasing Military gear. As long as it does not fall out of the spectrum of standard issue. i.e. You will purchase any worn out or missing gear. Is a lawful order.
GIs, which stands for "Government Issue"
The standard issue firearm is a small, lightweight gun called the P99
No. Titanium costs approximately 10 times more than steel and titanium is only lighter that steel. You actually will need more titanium than steel for armor (strength to size issue). Tanks don't have problem with heavy armor so weight is not an issue for them.
Early in the twentieth century, the Army began using standardized issue for all troops. Previous to this time, issue could be standard to individual units, but was not typical service wide. In the noemclature was the term General Issue, as in "Tool, Entrenchment, Folding, General Issue." Because all soldiers were like equiped, they all looked similar, therefore the connection was made that the soldiers were also General Issue, "General Issue" --- G.I.
There are a lot of weapons which are standard issue. Assuming you're referring to the service rifle, it's the L85A2.
The standard issue RCMP gun is the Smith & Wesson 5946 9mm Double Action Only pistol.
The hatties hatpin in January 2011 issue of Reminsce Extra magazine page number is 34 and 6
You can't yet, but maybe they will issue a deathknight armor in SwordFall coming up. -Atenzia
In most states I believe it is fine to purchase type III armor. The issue in some states is you must not have any previous convictions. In the UK its completely legal.