No government should be allowed to spy without restraint on its citizens. But there is always tension between complete freedom and a government's duty to protect. There has to be a reasonable means for a government to gather information necessary to the security of the country. More and better information would have prevented 911, but on the other hand, we have no idea what other atrocities have been averted because the right information was gathered and applied in time. Outright spying without cause and without restraint is the behavior of tyrants.
spy on its citizens
spy on it's citizens
Spy on its citizens
While no government group is known to use camera inside US homes, the governmental agency that most frequently spies on citizens is the Border Patrol, which frequently patrols US borders and nearby areas with unmanned drones.
any thing that can receive a signal
There have been rumors that Amerlia Earhart was a spy for the US government to watch the Japanese.
Spy cameras are not allowed in changing rooms due to the fact that it is illegal and is clearly invading the individual's privacy. The store would get sued if any spy cameras were found in the changing rooms.
Most Americans saw that if you were Asian you were a secret spy for Japan. Even the American Government captured it's own citizens and put them in camps.
the 2002 film I Spy Eddie Murphy's mission is to recover what for the US government
yes he was a spy theres documents to prove that he was he wrote plays to pass on info.
A spy gets paid by the people or agency that wants the information the spy is looking for. If it's a government agency, then the tax payers are paying the spy's salary. If it is an industrial spy looking for a company's secrets, then the corporation that hired the spy will pay the bill.
Only the goverment but other wise nobody really.