The main argument in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) centered on the legality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth Black, challenged Louisiana's segregation laws after being arrested for sitting in a whites-only train car. The Supreme Court upheld the state's law, asserting that racial segregation did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, as long as the separate facilities were equal in quality. This decision institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination in the United States for decades.
The Fourteenth Amendment gave him the right to equal treatment on a train.
Plessy's Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated.(ALS)
Making Plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution
Plessy v. Ferguson
The Supreme Court decided that Plessy's plan was still treating the negro as if they were being segerated.
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896),
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)No. Plessy v. Ferguson was a US Supreme Court case that legally sanctioned racial segregation.
This is from the Supreme Court case Plessy vs. Ferguson.
That would be the Supreme Court Case Plessy vs. Furgeson
Plessy v. Ferguson.
As a result of Plessy v. Ferguson, black and white southerners were legally segregated.
The main argument in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) centered around the constitutionality of racial segregation laws. Homer Plessy, who was of mixed race, challenged Louisiana's Separate Car Act, arguing that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court upheld the segregation law, establishing the "separate but equal" doctrine, which justified racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were considered equal, thereby reinforcing systemic racism and discrimination in the United States.