The admission of such a vast new state as free soil was a major concession by the South. That is why Congress felt they needed to make a big gesture to appease the South, in the form of the controversial Fugitive Slave Act.
California. (New Respondent) No, California was to be free - a major decision that needed a big gesture of appeasement for the South. This gesture was the Fugitive Slave Act that brought the civil war a long step closer. I'm not sure it admitted any new slave-states. I think it allowed for the states of Utah and New Mexico to be eligible for slavery under certain conditions when the time came.
Abraham Lincoln did not believe that he needed to compromise with the South on the issue of expansion of slavery in the Territories. He thought that the Southern States were bluffing and would not leave the Union.
The Americans found that they could work together during the Revolutionary War. In peacetime, things did not work well. They needed taxation to have an army and they needed currency. The Articles of Confederation needed change. The Colonists needed to stop being Virginians, New Yorkers, and North Carolinians; they needed to think as Americans. So they had to come together to write a Constitution.
A denomination is needed, please post new question with more information.
By definition, a compromise is a resolution of conflicting sectional interests. 'National compromise' doesn't mean too much. The Compromise of 1850 was a rather desperate attempt to replace the successful Missouri Compromise, which had kept the peace for thirty years, but was rendered inoperable by the admission of California - too big to fit the geographical terms of the compromise. In the new deal, California would be admitted as free soil - a major concession by the South, who then needed to be appeased by the Fugitive Slave Act, allowing official slave-catchers to hunt down runaways. This did not keep the peace, as we know.
compromise opens up for change that everyone obviously agrees is needed.
It was all about how to avoid having an argument each time a new state needed to be admitted to the Union. In both cases, a compromise was worked-out. The Missouri Compromise lasted thirty years. The Compromise of 1850 soon collapsed.
it was my penis
The admission of such a vast new state as free soil was a major concession by the South. That is why Congress felt they needed to make a big gesture to appease the South, in the form of the controversial Fugitive Slave Act.
No. No one can exist without it. There will always be people who disagree with each other, so compromise is needed to get business done.
when both the parties don't compromise, or rich enough to feed lawyer.
Commerce Compromise
commerce compromise
As its name suggests, it was in 1850! This was when California was coming up for admission to the USA. It was too big to fit the terms of the Missouri Compromise. That's why they needed a new deal.
because if the general amnesty act never wet into effect the compromise of 1877 would have never needed to happen. Therefore the general amnesty act brought the need of the compromise of 1877
Four Years are needed