the small states benefited the most.
The dominance of individual states in the South prevented unified economic actions, such as taxes to support the various Confederate armies. The states could not agree on many policies, which impaired the coordination of military efforts.
European powers divided China into spheres of influence, while the United States promoted an Open Door Policy.
The north had more of a social and economic mix.
the north had more of a social an economic mix
scalawags," "carpetbaggers," and freedmen
All citizens vote directly on economic policies
the small states benefited the most.
The Zollverein is a coalition of the states of Germany formed to manage economic policies and manage tariffs.
Yes. There is a direct linking. Usually crisis situations arise as a result of poor policies. For ex: a few years ago, the united states had lax economic policies and was practically giving away loans for free. This uncontrolled lending led to a global economic slowdown and a lot of losses to people across the globe. Once a crisis starts, usually economic policies are adjusted to minimize the impact of the crisis
small states
The smaller states benefited, because the smaller states had no use for slaves. Due to the fact that they didn't have any crops or enough property.
his economic policies were only achieved to the fall of the Articles of Condeferation and the rise of the constitution adopted by only 9 of the 13 states. the constitution made a new government with limited powers for judiciary power. presidents were limited also .
rashi
Slave states.
The people of Cuba benefited. The people of Puerto Rico benefited. The people of Guam benefited. The people of the Philippines benefited. The people of the United States benefited. The people of Spain probably benefited in that they received $20 milllion and were rid of the expense of trying to govern their foreign colonies who were in rebellion.
Southern States. (NovaNet)