The South would struggle to win a sustained war with the North due to its limited resources, industrial capacity, and smaller population. The North had a more extensive railway network and greater access to manufacturing, which allowed for better supply lines and military equipment production. Additionally, the North's larger army provided a significant manpower advantage, making it difficult for the South to maintain a prolonged conflict. Ultimately, these factors would hinder the South's ability to sustain a war of attrition against the North.
The South could not secede again. There are too many laws and enforcements that would make it nearly impossible for the South to secede.
i am a north african trader!
Import tariffs to protect American industry, which was nearly all in the North. It was the South that wanted cheap imports, but would be increasingly taxed on them. The annexing of vast territories from Mexico, which many people believed should be free soil. This would have weakened Southern voting power in Congress.
The north had destroyed it and the north and the south had a huge argument on who would rebuild the whole mess and who would pay for the damages,
Sectional compromise did not work in 1860 for many reasons. One of them being that this was the time during the great potato famine in Ireland, so the refugees cascaded into the northern states in the 1850's. Therefore, the north had no room. Once the Europeans were in America, they had no desire for the practice of slavery, and the north states were not convinced to compromise over slavery. The new compromise was put out for grabs, but Lincoln rejected it because he would not allow the extension of slavery. Also, the Crittenden Compromise would allow new slave states, but Lincoln would not accept this, either.
It would be nearly impossible to work out, as Hawaii is in the middle of the North Pacific Ocean.
That probably changes constantly, and would be nearly impossible to determine without a census of any inhabitants. An accurate answer couldn't be given.
it would be nearly impossible to stop cuz it is slippery
Selective breeding be nearly impossible without a wide variation of species. This is usually done to create a specific breed of animals.
This would be very hard, in fact, nearly impossible. And if you did, it would be by pure chance.
No , It would be nearly impossible.
if they are completely broken and bandaged i would think it would be nearly impossible to write.
If copyright law did not apply to the internet, it would be nearly impossible to monetize anything on it.
well if you went without a suit you would explode and freeze but it would be nearly impossible to land on one anyway
The South's inability to win a sustained war with the North stemmed from significant disadvantages, including a smaller population and fewer industrial resources, which limited their capacity to produce weapons and supplies. Additionally, the North's extensive rail network and greater financial resources allowed for more efficient troop movement and logistics. The Union's naval blockade further restricted the South's access to trade and reinforcements. Ultimately, these factors made it increasingly difficult for the Confederacy to maintain a prolonged conflict.
That would be nearly impossible to answer. Most people are interested in the top answers.
Because of the extreme climate of Antarctica, it is nearly impossible for humans to survive there for an extended period of time. Nearly all of Antarctica is covered in ice about a mile thick. Extracting resources from the land of Antarctica would be nearly impossible and very costly.