Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
The significance of World War 2 is that the Western World will not accept aggressors, oppressors and genocide murderers. We expect peace and non-aggression. The United Nations was formed to accomplish that value.
Henry Cabot lodge
There would be no slaves in the world..dugh
Woodrow Wilson.
it would have been the same world just without her we would not have a Queen of Egypt.
A homophone for "accept" is "except."
Yes. Almost all major banks in the world accept money from foreign nations. They would accept the money and credit your local account with local currency money equivalent to the foreign currency money you deposited.
No, if the mission is not in alignment with my objectives, I would not accept it. It is important to make choices that support your own goals and values.
wats cafe world
That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.That would be up to the owner of the property whether they would accept you as a co-signer.
Would someone probably accept what? Please rewrite your question -- we want to help! :)
Yes they would accept it.
They felt that capitalist nations were trying to dominate the economy They did not accept the aims of the World Bank and IMF
The opposite of "accept" (agree) is reject, or refuse. The opposite of "accept" (acknowledge) would be refute, or deny.
Spanish
No
yes and no, yes because it would be so much easier, and no because it would take forever for everyone to accept