The policy of appeasement was used by the French and British to appease Hitler in the hopes that Hitler would leave their nations alone. The "appeasement camp" thought that if Hitler was given what he wanted he would be satisfied. They did not understand Hitler and his agendas. They Brits and French were made to look like fools when they found out Hitler had already taken the the Sudetenland at the time of the Munich Conference and signing of the pact that allowed Hitler to have the Sudetenland within Czechoslovakia. The policy appeasement is as foolish as giving your lunch to the school bully when he will only come back the next day.
Historians identify this time period in human history as the beginning of 'recorded history'. Writing allows us to express, explain, document and share the reasons why we do what we do. While at the same time it creates a record for others to use to learn and understand.
The policy of appeasement was meant to make the Germans happy with the Versailles Treaty in theory. However, in reality it was to keep Hitler happy with the United States, England and France so he would not invade their nations. In a real sense it merely bought them time to get ready for Hitler coming but they did not have enough military readiness to accomplish that. In a way it gave them a false sense of security.
Yes, the appeasement policy of Britain helped Hitler gain the stronghold over Europe and ended with the blitzing of London. The first aggressive land grabs of Hitler were allowed, since British and other leaders felt it was something he had a right to do, and if they ignored it, he would stop. He didn't, and by the time they entered the war after Hitler's invasion of Poland, he had gained too much power to be immediately stopped.
Neville Chamberlain justified his policy of appeasement by arguing that it was necessary to maintain peace in Europe and avoid another devastating war like World War I. He believed that by making concessions to Adolf Hitler, such as allowing the annexation of certain territories, he could satisfy Germany's grievances and stabilize the region. Chamberlain felt that this approach would buy time for Britain to rearm and prepare for potential conflict. Ultimately, he hoped that diplomacy could resolve tensions and foster a lasting peace.
cause that supported the HITLER, because all Germant wanted is to oppose the treaty of versailles and be like nothing happened so they wouldnt lost anything my making up the war(s).
cause that supported the HITLER, because all Germant wanted is to oppose the treaty of versailles and be like nothing happened so they wouldnt lost anything my making up the war(s).
England and France did not wish to engage Germany in another war. Letting Germany take over a country or two seemed reasonable at the time to the leaders of France and Britain.
It was the 1938 Agreement that gave the Sudetenland of Czechoslovakia to Germany. Called an act of appeasement it was supposed to insure "peace in our time".
Adolf Hitler viewed appeasement as a sign of weakness and took advantage of it to further his aggressive expansionist goals in Europe.
there was three reasons 1- Britain did not want to go to war 2- They were buying time to build their army 3- Some agreed that the treaty of Versailles was harsh
It may have bought them some time, but the war wasn't prevented.
'Peace in our Time' said Chamberlain when he returned from Munich.
Because of the same reasons other religons are created. To base economic growth, hope, comfort etc. It helped to explain natural events that local science at the time couldn't explain. At the time, it made sense
By March 1939 it was obvious that the policy of appeasement had failed. Britain introduced compulsory military service (for the first time ever in peace time) and gave a guarantee to Poland. When Germany invaded Poland in September 1939 Britain and France declared war on Germany ...
No Time To Explain happened in 2011.
Yes he did. It was at Munich with his appeasement policy. On his return, he made his 'peace in our time' speech.