Historians commonly cite several factors as causes of World War I, including militarism, alliances, Imperialism, and nationalism. The arms race and military strategies contributed to heightened tensions, while complex alliances, such as those formed by the Triple Alliance and Triple Entente, created a web of obligations that drew multiple nations into conflict. Additionally, imperial ambitions fueled rivalries among European powers, and intense nationalism stoked desires for territorial expansion and independence, particularly in the Balkans. These elements combined to create a volatile environment that ultimately led to the outbreak of war in 1914.
The cause is the German and Austro-Hungarian imperialism.
The question is incomplete. There are no options given (for "which of the following") to answer this question.
You didn't give "the following", but I assume one of them was "the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand."
Historians often cite several key causes of World War I, including militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism. The arms race among European powers fueled a culture of militarism, while complex alliances, such as those between Germany and Austria-Hungary or France and Russia, created a web of obligations that escalated conflicts. Additionally, imperial competition for colonies heightened tensions, and rising nationalist sentiments contributed to the desire for territorial expansion and independence. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914 acted as the immediate catalyst that triggered the war.
Which of the following events could possibly have been a cause of Spanish troops conquering the Inca capital Cusco.
The cause is the German and Austro-Hungarian imperialism.
The question is incomplete. There are no options given (for "which of the following") to answer this question.
Growth of big business is given as a cause for the concentration of wealth in the 1800s.
You didn't give "the following", but I assume one of them was "the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand."
They wanted to know why things happen the way they happened.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
because they want to understand why events happened the way they did
Historians study cause-effect connections to understand why events happened and how they influenced each other. By analyzing these connections, historians can gain insight into the broader patterns of history and make sense of the complexities of the past. This helps them draw conclusions about the impact of certain actions or decisions on shaping historical events.
Chronology is an important social study skill that allows historians to sequence events in order to understand the flow of history. By placing events in the correct order, historians can analyze cause-and-effect relationships and draw conclusions about the past.
Historians use methods such as analyzing primary sources, conducting research, and evaluating evidence to identify cause and effect in historical events. By examining multiple sources, looking for patterns, and considering various perspectives, historians can identify and interpret the relationships between events to determine causes and effects. This helps them create a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of history.
which one of the following was not a cause of tention between french and english realtions in canada?