Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
In the 16th century, children of wealthy or royal families usually had their marriages arranged for them. Less fortunate people had more of a chance to choose who they wanted to marry.
The statement indicates an attitude of patronizing paternalism directed towards the native people. This was simply a weak means of justifying their imperialistic actions, without having to honestly admit they were plundering the country of its natural resources for Great Britain's gain.
there was still a lingering thought of states rights and the compactness of the federal government. laizai-faire(sp) attitude towards commerce.
u need to be really different from others to make a difference in the world... different here meaning a positively different attitude and approach towards life
Spain had colonies of its own all over Middle and South America. Supporting people rebelling against their mother country openly would have meant undermining their own position towards their colonies.
occoding to my calculations your stupid
pata nahi
pata nahi
it was bad they made them drink out of a toilet
according to my world history book englands attitude towards slavery was really strict in fact some people even were punished depending on their crime
They has to pray
The Dutch saw them as trading partners. . The Dutch were not interested in converting them.
The Europeans thought the Africans couldn't handle the government themselves.
he thought that the people were his property, and that he would get more money with taxing more people.
The British encouraged Americans to export raw goods to Britain. PLATO!!
The British encouraged Americans to export raw goods to Britain. PLATO!!
His attitude towards his suffering was a strong attitude