true
You can imagine any 3 dimensional shape as stacking the 2 dimensional version of that shape on top of each other.
Actually, it is false.
You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height).
Height of one 2-d obect = 0
so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0
So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object.
Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
That's more of a statement than a question. It's also a false statement. You can build a three dimensional object from two dimensional objects, if you have an infinite number of them.
[object Object]
a model
not really because they are 2 diffrent objects floor and stair hall is only BUILT on the floor witch makes it no.
Built up area is the area which has been developed.and floor area is the area which is about to built or about to develope.
The smaller objects which are built to represent the larger objects are called Model
The smaller objects which are built to represent the larger objects are called Model
false
Object[] arrayToBeSorted; Arrays.sort(arrayToBeSorted);
That's more of a statement than a question. It's also a false statement. You can build a three dimensional object from two dimensional objects, if you have an infinite number of them.
Direct objects receive the action of the verb.Carl built a house. (a house is the direct object)Indirect objects receive the direct object.Martha handed me her hat. (her hat is the direct object; me is the indirect object)Predicate nominatives and predicate adjectives follow a linking verb and rename or describe the subject.Carl is a carpenter. (a carpenter is the predicate nominative)Martha is happy. (happy is the predicate adjective)
Not really. You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height). Height of one 2-d obect = 0 so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0 So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object. Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
false Actually, the statement is true. You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height). Height of one 2-d obect = 0 so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0 So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object. Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
Electrons. That is how static charge is built. Some of the electrons of one object move to the other, creating a negative charge where the electrons have built up, and a positive charge where the electrons have vacated.
whate is the procedure to built a class and object in visual basic.?
[object Object]
Java IS a pure OOP language. All types, including the built-in types, are implemented as objects.