yes yeovil are miles better as are dover athletic
In theory, the answer is no. Even as a Vale fan, I know that the Stoke City are better than us. Stoke are in the premier league and Vale are in League one, However, Stoke is in the Premier League. From these facts, we can tell that Stoke are better than Vale.
no
A lot better
If Liverpool got beat off stoke then manu is better
On current form, no; but form is temporary, class is permanent. The Liverpool trophy cabinet shows their true class. Stoke have nothing much to show for their history.
two stoke bikes have more power then 4 storke. 4 storke are better for trail riding and 2 stroke are better for racing
There are no towns in NZ with a population bigger than 50,000 (the definition of a city in NZ) the largest town beginning with S is Stoke in Wellington, population around 15,000.
WELL BRISTOL CITY ARE IN A HIGHER LEAGUE SO BRISTOL CITY ARE BETTER there both shite
want a debate speech on Town llife is better than city life
It depends on personal preferences and lifestyle. Cities offer more job opportunities, entertainment options, and cultural diversity. Villages provide a quieter, slower-paced environment with closer community connections and a simpler way of life. Ultimately, the better place to live is subjective and varies from person to person.
manchester city are crap and manchester united are the best team and are very good and better than manchester city.
Arsenal is way better than Manchester United and Manchester City!