i dont now
There is no solution.Consecutive negative integers will always add up to a negative number. 110 is positive.
No two consecutive integers can add up to 98.No three consecutive integers can add up to 98.But 23, 24, 25, and 26 can.
n(n+2)(n+4) = 24
There are no such integers. Proof: choose any positive whole number x two consecutive even integers: (2x) (2x+2) Take the sum (2x)+(2x+2) (2x)+(2x+2)=340 4x+2=340 4x=338 x=338/4=84.5 Since this is not a whole number, there is no whole number that satisfies the conditions. (There are two consecutive odd integers which add up to 340: 169 and 171)
-4, -2, 0, and 2 are the four consecutive even integers. When you add them up they equal -4.
10 12 14 are the consecutive even integers which add up to 36
That isn't possible. The three consecutive number are assumed to be integers; the sum of three consecutive integers is always a multiple of 3 (try it out).
The integers are -11, -9 and -7.
The sum of the first 60 positive integers (1 + 2 + 3 + .... + 59 + 60) is equal to 1830.
This is impossible - no four consecutive integers add to 36.
Let's call the three consecutive integers x, x+1, and x+2. The sum of these integers is x + (x+1) + (x+2) = 3x + 3. We know that this sum is equal to 135, so we can set up the equation 3x + 3 = 135. Solving for x gives us x = 44. Therefore, the three consecutive integers are 44, 45, and 46.
Let the first integer be x. Since the integers are consecutive odds we know that the integers are x, x+2, x+4,and x+6. Since the sum of all of these is 200 we can set up the equation:4x+12 = 200. Solving we get x=47. Therefore the integers are 47, 49, 51, and 53.