They cannot be compared. A mile is a measure of how long something is. A square mile is an area which is the same as the area of a square where each side is one mile.
No, square miles are a measure of area, while miles are a measure of distance. A square mile is equivalent to one mile wide and one mile long, so in terms of distance, one mile is longer than one square mile.
Germany is approximately 80,000 square miles bigger than the UK.
Square miles is bigger than miles square. Square miles refers to an area that is one mile by one mile, totaling one square mile. Miles square refers to an arrangement of miles in a square shape, which is not a standard unit of measurement.
The United States is approximately 2,973,000 square miles, making it a little larger than 2,000,000 square miles.
The total area of Europe is approximately 3.93 million square miles, which is smaller than the United States, which has a total area of about 3.8 million square miles.
A kilometer is a measure of length, and a square mile is a measure of area, so you can't compare them. However, a mile is longer than a kilometer (comparing length to length), and a square mile is larger than a square kilometer (comparing area to area).
Miles measures distance. Square miles measures area. Therefore, you can not compare the two.
A river can't be measured in square miles but the longest river in the UK is the River Severn at 218 miles - just marginally longer than the River Thames at 215 miles.
no 2.2 miles is longer
Czech Republic - 30,450 square miles. (Czechoslovakia no longer exists).
No, but a meter is longer than a mile.
Yugoslavia no longer exists.
longer
Miles are longer than kilometers.
Miles are longer than feet
15 miles is about 30,000 feet longer than 15km
5 miles is slightly longer than 8 km.
Yes because 5 miles is 100 feet longer than 26300 feet