Want this question answered?
verifiable
verifiable truth, reality, actuality, authenticity, certainty, gospel truth, law, verity
Atheism does not mean "100% certainty that God does not exist, with no willingness to question and no room for doubt. For the overwhelming majority of people who call themselves atheists, this is not what "atheism" means. For most atheists, "atheism" means something along the lines of "being reasonably certain that there are no gods," or, "having reached the provisional conclusion, based on the evidence we've seen and the arguments we've considered, that there are no gods."No, we can't be 100% certain that there are no gods. We can't be 100% certain that there are no unicorns, or Santas or tooth fairies either. But we're certain enough.AnswerTo date, there is simply no measurable, testable, scientifically verifiable evidence for the existence of a god. It's as simple as that.
There are various types of graphs. You need to be more specific. Graphs exist for thousands of subjects, and each one is different. But, basically, you need to gather all verifiable information on the subject in question before you begin.
Many, many products claim to be number one, preferred, best, most loved, most powerful, most popular, etc. The ability of companies to advertise products this way has been tested in courts in the United States and elsewhere. When the statement is a matter of opinion, personal taste, or judgement, a certain amount of hyperbole is accepted. When the statement makes a very specific, verifiable claim about a product ("#1 selling truck four years in a row" or "proven to cure diabetes permanently") that statement must be defensible. Sometimes the statement that a product is number one will have an explanation or limitation presented when the statement is made ("#1 selling fuel efficient car*" might have "*of all American four-door four-cylinder gasoline engine cars in 2008" elsewhere on the page).
Objective information is measurable or verifiable.
Objective criteria refers to measurable standards or factors that are impartial and easily verifiable. These criteria are not influenced by personal opinions or biases, and are used to evaluate effectiveness, performance, or quality in an unbiased manner.
An objective statement is based on facts and observable phenomena, while a non-objective statement is influenced by personal opinions, biases, or emotions. Objective statements are verifiable and rooted in evidence, whereas non-objective statements often reflect subjective viewpoints or interpretations.
statements that a person can, in principle, verify for himself or herself
Ayer argues that ethical statements are not verifiable or falsifiable in the same way that empirical statements are, as they are not grounded in observable facts. Therefore, he concludes that ethical judgments are simply expressions of personal preference or emotion rather than objective truths.
The lack of observable evidence
considered meaningless because it is not verifiable through empirical evidence. Logical positivists believed that meaningful statements must either be directly verifiable through sense experience or be reducible to statements that are verifiable through sense experience. Since the existence of God cannot be empirically verified, they deemed it as meaningless.
Literal qualities refer to characteristics that are actual, explicit, and undeniable. They are facts or aspects that are directly observable or verifiable, as opposed to being interpreted subjectively or metaphorically.
verifiable objective is a a kind of objective which is quantitative,while non-verifiable is qualitative.
Science deals in observable, verifiable phenomena rather than purely in abstractions, so it is more concrete than religion and philosophy.
Positivism is a philosophical approach that emphasizes observable facts and verifiable data as the basis for knowledge. An example of positivism is the use of scientific experiments to test hypotheses and draw conclusions based on empirical evidence.
Strictly speaking, science is the practice of studying measurable and verifiable data. Experiences of God cannot be recorded in a way that allows them to be verified by later observers, and the results cannot repeated. This is why the study of God is not science.