One piece bats are always stronger than any 2 piece pat such as the stealth so they are more durable (Imagine doing power swings on heavy balls). You might get more pop from the Easton, but that depends on your swing and how it works with the flexible joint on the bat. Imagine a fishing pole, with just the right whip you can cast a weight a long way, too little, too much or mistimed and the energy from the flexing pole is lost. Same with the Easton. In general the Nike bats are well made and have plenty of pop, another great thing is that they can be found on sale for much less than the Stealth. Gook luck and good hitting.
easton stealth. nike bats suck. and the stealth has pretty decent pop.
cf5 because i have the easton speed and it has no pop
Easton Synergy. Much, much better.
stealth is not a bbcor and the omen is
the better bat would definitely be the easton stealth. the demarini cf4 is a good bat too but if the bat is hit on the wrong part of the bat, the ball will not go like it does on the easton. the stealth has a massive sweet spot/barrel and also has a lot more pop than the demarini.
if youre looking for a full piece half and half bat then get the h2, but if you want a 2 piece with some pop then get the stealth. i would probably pick the stealth.
TPX Triton Probably the Triton but the '08 stealth is still pretty good.
I think the synergy is but i havent had a chance to use the stiff flex.
easton
Well, the Easton Stealth is a fairly good bat; which as the CF3 is amazing. I have one and I hit bombs. The Stealth takes longer to break in, while the CF3 does not. But when the Stealth is broken in it's amazing too, but i would go with the CF3.
That question is subjective because some bats are better for some players, but in general it probably is better than the Nike, but neither is better than a DeMarini Voodoo or an Easton Stealth.
easton 999