Want this question answered?
If a player is traded, the franchise tag is basically null. The franchise tag applies only to free agency. However, if a team went through the effort and expense of putting the franchise tag on a player (paying that player the average of the top 5 salaries at the player's position), the possibility of them trading that player is highly unlikely.
No one. Club opted to not use tag?
Once they have signed a contract or the player received a franchise tag
maybe
A Franchise tag is not a German phrase. It refers to privileged labeling, i.e. in professional sports. Also see weblink below.
It depends, a franchise tag is a one-year contract that the player has to accept. The team pays that player the league average salary for that position.
yes
According to this news story, players can be traded after having the franchise tag applied to them: http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7569946/philadelphia-eagles-likely-franchise-wr-desean-jackson-report-says
Each team can franchise on player whose contract is over each year. A franchise is a one-year contract. The player cannot be franchised two years in a row, but can be again later in his career. The team looks at all the players in the NFL at his position. They remove any other franchised players. Then, they average the top five player's salary and pay the player that much. Once a player has been franchised, he cannot try to get a better deal.
Yes
No, He was drafted by Chicago and is currently under the Franchise Tag with them.
In the xhtml we can define our self tag means here is user define tag but in HTML it is not.