In other words, we require a sequence of consecutive numbers none of which are prime.
This can be guaranteed if we obtain (10 + 1)! = 39916800
Then clearly, 39916800 + 2 is divisible by 2, 39916800 + 3 is divisible by 3, and so on to 39916800 + 11 is divisible by 11.
Consequently, all ten numbers from 39916802 - 39916811 are composite.
W is a variable. It could stand for a composite number, but it doesn't have to.
It could be a fraction or an irrational number.
Composite. Because 65 can be divided by 5. So factors could be 1,65,13,5 etc.
Consecutive identical digits could be digits that are the same and appear next to one another in a number. For example, the hundreds and tens digits in 1442 could be considered consecutive identical.
4,564,282 is a composite number because you could divide by two. Another hint that it's composite is that it ends in a two. All even numbers greater than 2 are composite.
Take your pick: It could be 33: the only composite number with repeated digits It could be 71: the only prime number It could be 4: the only square number It could be 106: the only composite number with all different digits.
No number an be both. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite.
75 Is a Composite Number Becausee Itt Could Bee Multipled By Otherr Numbers Than Only Justt 1 and Itself
Yes 405 is composite. Its factors are 1,5,81,and 405. There could be more but i don't know it! =)
You could try dividing by composite numbers but the number that you are testing is divisible by a composite number, then it will be divisible by a prime factor of that composite number and that prime factor will be smaller. It is always easier to work with smaller numbers.
4,564,282 is a composite number because you could divide by two also because it ends in a two that means it is even so you could divide
The answer will depend on the exact definition of both "whole number" and "counting number" as both terms are potentially open to different interpretations. For example, a counting number could be defined as all the positive integers, e.g. 1,2,3,4 etc... A whole number could be defined as all the non negative integers, e.g. 0,1,2,3,4 etc.. In which case the answer would be 0. However, it could be argued that counting numbers include 0, making the above answer invalid. Equally it could be argued that whole numbers include the negative integers, in which case the answer would include any negative whole number.