0
Which of the following statement about interpreting historical evidence is true?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
New sources and ideas may change the interpreting of events
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between a fact and a statement?
The difference between fact and statement is that a fact is something that is empirically true and can be supported by evidence while a statement is a belief that may or may not be backed up with some type of evidence.
Why is it important to test your hypothesis and collect evidence?
A hypothesis is a testable statement. To check the accuracy of your statement, you need to design an experiment to test it and collect data. Then you analyze your data to see how well it supported your hypothesis.
When you interpret what you have observed you are inferring true or false?
When interpreting what you have observed, you are making an inference based on the available evidence. This inference can be either true or false depending on the accuracy of the observations and the validity of the reasoning used to make the interpretation.
Social inequality was both accepted and resisted in classical civilizations. What evidence might support this statement?
It was mainly on inequalities of both male and female.
Is there evidence outside the Bible that proves Matthew was a historical person?
In the early first century, Matthew was never mentioned by anyone outside the gospels, and the gospel that bears his name was written anonymously and only attributed to Matthew later in the second century. So, the existence of the gospel is not evidence for the historicity of Matthew and there is no other extra-biblical evidence for him.
What statement about historical claims is correct?
A good claim is supported by many pieces of reliable evidence.
Historical thinking skills can be divided into three main processes asking questions and drawing conclusions.?
Historical thinking skills involve analyzing evidence, constructing arguments based on that evidence, and interpreting historical events within their context. By asking critical questions, making connections between events, and drawing well-supported conclusions, historians can gain a deeper understanding of the past.
What are methods of historical inquiry?
Some methods of historical inquiry include analyzing primary sources, conducting archival research, interpreting artifacts, studying oral histories, and using comparative analysis techniques. These methods help historians understand the past, evaluate evidence, and construct narratives about historical events and developments.
Is there evidence from a recent flood?
If the Flood of Noah's day was a real historical event and was worldwide we would expect to find some or all of the following evidence on the earth: Lots of ...
Why is historical thinking skill of interpretation important for historians?
The historical thinking skill of interpretation is important for historians because it allows them to analyze, evaluate, and draw conclusions from historical evidence. By interpreting the past, historians can uncover different perspectives, gain insights into why events occurred, and make sense of complex historical narratives. This skill is crucial for constructing accurate and meaningful historical interpretations.
How can new evidence change historical interpreting?
If new evidence comes to light then it will change an historians view on it, if they write for example that John Wilkes Booth killed Lincoln and they stick by that view, and then they find new evidence that George from booth number 5 did it then of course the interpretation of that event will change and so will everybody's views on it
Are there alternative ways of interpreting the evidence psych assignment study 1?
no
What is historical method of inquiry?
The historical method of inquiry involves analyzing and interpreting historical events using primary sources and other forms of evidence. Historians use this method to reconstruct the past and understand the context, causes, and consequences of events. This process helps to provide a deeper insight into how and why events unfolded in a specific way.
The response of each society to European imperialism grew out of its larger historical development and its internal problems What evidence might support this statement?
p e n i s
How do historians make inferences?
Historians make inferences by analyzing and interpreting historical sources such as documents, artifacts, and other evidence to draw conclusions about the past. They consider the context in which the sources were created, corroborate information from multiple sources, and apply critical thinking skills to construct plausible explanations about historical events and developments.
What following Characteristic of a good thesis statement?
A good thesis statement is clear and specific, presenting a concise argument that can be supported with evidence. It should be relevant to the topic and guide the reader on what to expect in the rest of the paper.
Which is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history?
Corroborated sources of historical evidence. (APEX) !/
