How about: 167+2 = 169
They are: 13*13 = 169 or 167+2 = 169
13 x 13
There are two prime numbers with squares between 100 and 300. These prime numbers are 11 and 13. (112 = 121 and 132 = 169.)
The factors of 169 are 1, 13, and 169, and the prime factors are 13 x 13. 169 is the product of 1 x 169 or of the prime factors 13 x 13.
How about: 13 times 13 = 169
No two prime numbers can make 30.No two prime numbers can make 30.No two prime numbers can make 30.No two prime numbers can make 30.
It is 81 because the rest of them are prime numbers squared and 9 is not a prime number because it has more than two factors.
Relative prime-ness requires a set of two or more numbers to share the same positive integer factors and no others. Since the number 54 adds the factors 9, 18, and 27, to the factors of 12, the two numbers are not relatively prime.
The two numbers can be any two numbers so that when they are added, they equal 338.
It is impossible for the product of two prime numbers to be prime. It is impossible for the sum of two prime numbers to be prime as long as one of the numbers isn't 2.
It looks to me like you can can relax and not fret your mind over it. They don't ! Factors of 25 . . . 1, 5, 25 Factors of 49 . . . 1, 7, 49 Factors of 121 . . . 1, 11, 121 Factors of 169 . . . 1, 13, 169
The GCF of two prime numbers is 1.