answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, they are relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is 385 and 621 relatively primes?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do you factor 385 into a product of primes?

As a product of its prime factors: 5*7*11 = 385


What 3 primes CAN be mulitiplied to make 385?

The prime 5, 7, and 11 yield the product 385 when multiplied together.


Are 81 and 94 relatively primes?

Yes, 81 and 94 are relatively prime.


Lcm of 2 11 13?

since these numbers are relatively prime the LCM must be their productSo the LCM is 2x11x13 They MUST be relatively primes since they are primes!


Are 120 and 385 relatively prime?

No. They can both be divided by 5.


What are co primes?

Numbers are co-prime, or relatively prime, when their GCF is 1.


Are 9 and 26 relatively prime?

Yes they have no common prime factors. 9=3X3 and 26=2X13 Since no primes equal they are relatively prime!


What is the relative primes of 59 and 97?

59 and 97, being both prime, are relatively prime to each other.


What is 2 percent of 621?

2 percent of 621 = 12.422% of 621= 2% * 621= 0.02 * 621= 12.42


Are 8 and 10 relatively prime?

NO!!!! They are both compound numbers. . All even numbers are NON-primes , except '2'.


What is the number if 60 percent of it is 621?

if 60% of number = 621 then: number = 621 ÷ 60% = 621/(60/100) = 621×100/60 = 1035


Are 7 and 21 relatively prime?

27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.