It confuses correlation with causation
Your Using Logos
Plan better campaigns if they know what is important to the people- Dre Combs
The binomial distribution.
To support a hypothesis means you agree, and may even give supporting evidence.To refute it means you submit evidence that a hypothesis is incorrect , or you make a cogent and persuasive argument against it.
Not very likely. Very slim chances.
The design argument, which posits that the complexity and order in the universe suggest a designer, is convincing to some people because it provides a logical explanation for the existence of complex systems. However, others find it unconvincing due to alternative explanations, like natural selection, and the lack of direct evidence for a designer. Ultimately, the persuasiveness of the design argument can vary depending on an individual's perspective and beliefs.
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
Does this list make his argument more or less convincing? Why?
No.
An argument.
It is a proof.
This is referred to as making a logical appeal or using logical reasoning to convince someone of your point of view. It involves presenting a clear and coherent argument based on facts, evidence, and sound reasoning to persuade others to agree with your position.
It's called a proof
You could say, "There is no point convincing you that you are wrong."
She presented a cogent argument that convinced the audience of her point.
This is referred to as making a logical or rational appeal, often associated with the use of logos in persuasive communication. By using facts, evidence, and reasoning, the goal is to convince the audience through logical reasoning rather than emotions.
By having the most convincing argument backed up by the facts necessary to prove your innocence.