answersLogoWhite

0

How do you express 125 m in two significant figures?

Updated: 8/20/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Best Answer

125 m in two significant figures is: 120 m

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you express 125 m in two significant figures?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How do you express 1600 mL as two significant figures?

1600


Perform 3.2x1.05 and express the answer to the correct number of significant figures?

3.2*1.05=3.36=3.4(sf) With two significant figures


How can you express 149.1290861 in two significant figures?

149.1290861 is 149.13 with 2-place accuracy.


How many significant figures are in 2804?

4 significant figures in 4400. A digit within a number is considered significant if: 1. it is a non-zero OR 2. It is a zero that is between two significant figures OR 3. It is a zero at the end of the number To express four thousand four hundred with two significant figures use scientific notation: 4.4 * 103


Give the significant figures for 2.2 times 10 times 10?

There are two significant figures which are the two 2s.


How many significant figures 0.03?

There are 4 significant figures in 0.0032. Seems to be only 2 significant figures in this number.


What is 22.1 to two significant figures?

22.1 to two significant figures = 22


What is 23.81558 to two significant figures?

23.81558 to two significant figures is 24.


How many significant figures in 42?

42 has two significant figures.


How man significant figures is in 0.025?

Two significant figures.


How many significant figures are in 0.0018?

Two significant figures.


How many significant figures does 6.022 have?

The number 6.300 has four significant digits. We must assume that the only reason for including the two zeroes at the end is to express the precision of the measurement (whatever it was that was measured to yield this number). If you were only confident about the first two numbers, you would express it as 6.3 rather than 6.300 as you did.