Yes it is cause it breaks the rules
The rules says:
that you should pass to your team by a proper way not to your enemy team
because is isn't rugby
in volleyball you use your hands, and in soccer you use your feet, with the exception of the goalie. Also in volleyball, you play on a smaller court, with 6-8 players, in soccer you can have i believe up to 12 or 14 players on the field.
Soccer was and is creative because unlike most sports, most players don't use their hands (excluding the goalie)
catching the soccer ball because forfield players they aren't aloud to use their hands and arms, so yeah the skill they use that other players don't use is catching the soccer ball.
The hands from the wrist down should not be used in soccer.
Soccer is a sport in which you need to shoot the soccer ball into the other players net. On your side you want to keep the ball from going into your net. You cannot use your hands unless you are the goalie.
As Adolfo likes taking a peek at other players penis's when playing. Every few games he puts his hands near another players and says he was trying to tackle.
Soccer, used in America, is a sport where 11 players on a team play another team, with the object to score the ball into the opponents net. Hands are not allowed in soccer. Football used in America is a sport where two teams face each other and the object is to score more points. score a point by: Throwing the ball to a teammate in the end zone. kicking the ball through the yellow poles (field goal)
There are numerous differences between the two sports the most profound of which is that in Soccer players strike the ball with their feet whilst in Tennis players strike the ball with a item of sports equipment known as a racket
Soccer is played with your any part of your body except the hands. The only person that can use there hands is a goalkeeper.
Soccer players because they have to run more and put more effort into what they are doing. FOOTBALL SUCKS!!!------------------While obviously soccer players run for longer distances and for a longer period of time, that is not all there is to athleticism. Football involves speed, knowledge, running, throwing, catching, tackling, kicking, blocking, block shredding, and a whole mental game that goes a long with it. Soccer players have better cardio, in general better speed, kicking power, kicking precision, defending the net, and dribbling with the ball. None of that really relates to be athletic besides the running aspect. Yes, putting the top 25 fastest soccer players in a distance/speed race against the top 25 fastest football players, the soccer players win majority of the time. But in no way can you say soccer players are more athletic. Faster, yes. Athletic, no.The person above me is clearly a biased soccer fan.With that being said, gymnasts and MMA fighters are the best athletes, hands down.----------------------Well if you guys knew how to play soccer and what is to it then you would know how hard it is. In foot ball you do have to be strong and bulky to play the sport but you only need that energy for a little amount of time. So the team does a fail play and then they take a three minute brake and then start off another five second play following a five minute brake. Soccer on the other constant running, not stoping, one 10 minute brake after 45 minutes of playing. Also soccer players have to be incredibly fast and have to have amazing upper body strength, but anybody reading this would say no because they never scene or played real soccer before. So I think soccer players have to be more athletic and are.
Since the goalie is the only one allowed to use their hands, they have different uniforms so the referee's can identify them for the other players.