04 05 2004 in roman numerals?
35 people found this useful
Roman Numerals are what Romans used to use for numbers. Differentsymbols have different numeral values. For example, I = 1, V = 5,and X = 10. When these symbols are combined in different ways theother numbers are formed. There are several rules for the placementof the symbols. . You may place up to… 3 of the same symbol adjacent to each otherto indicate addition. For example: I = 1; II = 1+1 = 2; III = 1+1+1= 3. Note that IIII is not proper because you may have no more than3 of the same symbol in a row. . You may place a smaller symbol after a larger one to indicateaddition. For example: V = 5; VI = 5+1 = 6; VII = 5+1+1 = 7; VIII =5+1+1+1 = 8. Again VIIII would not be proper because there are 4 Isimmediately adjacent to each other. . You may place a smaller symbol immediately before a largersymbol to indicate subtraction. For example IV = 5-1 = 4; IX = 10-1= 9. The basic numerals are: I = 1 V = 5 X = 10 L = 50 C = 100 D = 500 M = 1000 If it has a line over it, it means multiply by 1000, like L, wouldbe 50,000 Some examples of correct Roman Numerals: III = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3 IX = 10 - 1 = 9 XIV = 10 + 5 - 1 = 14 XXXII = 10 + 10 + 10 + 1 + 1 = 32 LXIX = 50 + 10 + 10 - 1 = 69 MMVIII = 1000 + 1000 + 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 2008 MMIX = 1000 + 1000 + 10 - 1 = 2009 Here are some of the roman numerals: 1-I 5-V 10-X 20-XX 30-XXX 40-XL 50-L 60-LX 70-LXX 80-LXXX 90-XC 100-C 200-CC 300-CCC 400-CD 500-D 600-DC 700-DCC 800-DCCC 900-CM 1,000-M The first few Roman numerals are: I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII,IX, X, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII and so on. (MORE)
2004 = MMIV MMIV MMIV MMIV Super Bowl MMIV 2004 written in roman numeral is MMIV 2004 in roman numerals is MMIV MMIV
The Arabic (0-9) number system did not reach Europe until about 900 AD. Roman numerals date back to 1000 years BC and were the marks made on tally sticks and in stone. Their style was influenced by the Etruscan number system. They were originally quite different symbols from those in use today. In t…he middle ages they were aligned to the closest modern roman alphabet equivalent shape. Roman numerals were not just confined to whole numbers, fractions were indicated by a series of dots, each number and pattern of dots meaning a different part of the whole. (MORE)
Roman numerals.... 1 = I 2 = II 3 = III 4 = IV (or IIII on old clocks, watches and sundials) 5 = V 6 = VI 7 = VII 8 = VIII 9 = IX 10 = X 20 = XX 30 = XXX 40 = XL 50 = L 60 = LX 70 = LXX 80 = LXXX 90 = XC 100 = C 500 = D 1000 = M 2000 = MM 3000 = MMM After 3000 thousand are written by either placing… a horizontal bar over a numeral, to indicate that the numeral should be multiplied by 1000, or by placing the numeral inside brackets, which also indicates that it should be multiplied by 1000. Examples... 4000 = [IV] 10000 = [X] 523000 = [DXXIII] 1000000 = [M] The numbers 11 - 19 and 21 - 29 etc follow the same pattern as the numbers 1 to 9 but preceeded by X or XX etc. The same applies to numbers preceeded by 100s or 1000s. Some examples... 14 = XIV 44 = XLIV 88 = LXXXVIII 151 = CLI 423 = CDXXIII 666 = DCLXVI 1066 = MLXVI 2009 = MMIX (MORE)
XXI-IIII-MDCCCCLXXXIIII (1984) or XXI-IV-IVXMM (2000-16). Note that 1984 in Roman numerals is not MCMLXXXIV as you might have been told or read.
Roman numerals are a numeral system of ancient Rome based on letters of the alphabet, which are combined to signify the sum of their values.
Virtually all numbers can be made from various combinations of the 7 Roman numerals. I (1) V (5) X (10) L (50) C (100) D (500) and M (1000). -- further -- Adding a bar above any of the standard numerals (other than i) had the effect of multiplying that numeral's value by 1,000, so that a v w…ith a bar above it is 5,000 and an m with a bar is (MORE)
noone did cuz the srewed NHL (gary bettman) didnt pay the NHL players enof chedda" so they got mad and refused to play.
15 = XV, 05 = V and 88 = LXXXVIII, so 15-05-88 would be XV-V-LXXXVIII.
11 = XI, 5 = V and 1981 = MCMLXXXI, so the date 11 05 1981 would be XI-V-MCMLXXXI
5 is simply written as V. 1990 is written as MCMXC (M = 1000, CM = 900 and XC = 90) so 05-05-1990 would be written as V.V.MCMXC
7 (07) = VII, 5 (05) = V and 2009 = MMIX, so the entire date is written as VII.V.MMIX
04 28 85 converted into Roman numerals is IV-XXVIII-LXXXV. . The Romans sometimes wrote IV as IIII.
Another way to write:27-04-1969 in Roman numerals is: XXVII-IV-MCMLXIX Because X=10, XX=20, IV=4, M=1,000, CM=900, LX=60, IX=9
According to today's rules 05 03 1994 in Roman numerals is V-III-MCMXCIV . . But there is evidence to suggest that the Romans themselves would have written 1994 as MDCCCCLXXXXIIII.
yes you can, did it on my gt 03 tiburon, put a 05 front bumper on it, looks sick to
V xi mdcccci . Another contributor's answer: . Today's conversion of 05 11 1991 into Roman numerals is V-XI-MCMXCI . . The Romans themselves would have most probably chose to write 1991 as MDCCCCLXXXXI.
Today's conventional way of writing 04-06-1987 into Roman numerals is: IV-VI-MCMLXXXVII . . But the Romans themselves would have preferred these numerals to be written as: IIII-VII-MDCCCCLXXXVII.
14= XIV 04=IV 2008=MMVIII 14-04-2008 XIV-IV-MMVIII List: 1=I 2=II 3=III 4=IIII or IV 5= V 6=VI 7=VII 8=VIII or IIX 9=VIIII or IX 10 = X 20=XX 50=L 100=C 500=D 1000=M
In today's terms 05-08-1990 converted into Roman numerals is V-VIII-MCMXC. But in the times of the Romans themselves they would have probably wrote this out as V-VIII-MDCCCCLXXXX which can be simplified to V-IIX-XMM in the same way that the Roman numerals IIII and VIIII (4 and 9) are simplified to …IV and IX respectively. (MORE)
Nonas JER MMIX, or Nonas Iulius, MMIX July is Iulius. The abbreviation was JER. The fifth of each month was called Nonas. But that's Roman numeral V if you prefer.
Well, of course they did-clue's kind of in the title 'ROMAN NUMERALS' Additional answer The questioner asked How not Whether they invested them
One is I in Roman numerals. This is two II , but four is IV , V is five, and six is VI.
Mmiv, mmv, mmvi (THESE SHOULD BE IN CAPITAL LETTERS BUT THE PROGRAMME WON'T ALLOW IT) People LOL right? Oh and these Roman numerals are not correct.
7 is VII, 5 is V and 1991 is MCMXCI. It would be written as VII VMCMXCI.
Year 2008 is just simply MMVIII, it is not proper to express a date in roman numerals however if you insist on doing it it would be XXII-IV-MMVIII.
I suspect this question was taken from copywritten material, which is not allowed. Otherwise, you left out some crucial information.
December is the twelth month and would be XII. The 4th is represented by IV. And the year would be MCMLXXXIV. So it would normally be shown as XII-IV-MCMLXXXIV.
14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV 14 = XIV 5=V 2004 = MMIV
We don't normally represent dates in Roman numerals, only the year. However, the following would be the literal equivalent: XXV VI MMIV
They didn't because it was the Etruscans who concieved this form of numeracy and they once ruled the Romans.
In todays notation of Roman numerals: V-XXIX-LXXXIX But the ancient Romans would have notated them quite differently.
In todays modern era of Roman numerals: V-VII-MCMXCI But the ancient Romans probably wrote out 1991 simply as XMMI (2001-10)
In todays modern era of Roman numerals: XI-V-MCMXCII Note that the ancient Romans probably wrote out 1992 simply as XMMII (2002-10)
No where because this numeral system was created by the Etruscans who once ruled the Romans
do to write 04 in roman numerals Improved Answer:- It is: IV or IIII = 4
They didn't because this numeracy system was conceived by the Etruscans who once ruled the Romans. First of all, let me note that the theory that Rome was ruled by the Etruscans has now been challenged. Its evidence base was flimsy and its key tenets were based on unproven assumptions. More recent …archaeological evidence suggests a different picture. The Roman numerals were devised by the Romans (or probably the Latins more in general), not the Etruscans. The Roman numerals were not derived from Etruscan numerals. Two systems were partially related, probably due to the fact that both of them were inspired by the Attic numerals of the Greeks. However, they two used different symbols. Etruscan numerals are still not fully understood just as the Etruscan language has not been fully deciphered due to the small number of recovered inscriptions. The Roman system, like that of many ancient peoples, originated from a tally system. The counting of entities was recorded by etching tally marks on wood. That is why 1 is I, 2 in II and 3 is III. The tallies were added to each other. Every five notches there was a different symbol, like á¶º for 5. This symbol was later inverted and became V. Later in time, all these special symbols were converted into letters of the Latin alphabet: X (10), L (50), C (100), D (50), M (1,000). Thus, 15 was XV, 20 was XX, 25 was XXV, 30 was XXX, 60 Was LX, 110 was CX, 150 was CL, 170 was CLXX, etc. The system was originally complicated. For example 8 was IIIIVIII. It was then simplified with an abbreviation; 8 became VIII. 23 was originally IIIIVIIIIXIIIIVIIIIXIII. Later it was abbreviated as XXIII. (MORE)
The Romans used "Roman Numerals" the same way that we use our Arabic numerals. They were used for all things mathematical, accounting, adding, subtracting, etc. The difference was just in the writing of the numbers, such as V for a 5 or X for a 10.
You provide each segment as a separate number. In this case it would be V-XII-MCMXCIV.
Romans numerals are the number of the Romans. The were I (1) V (5) X (10) L (50) C (100) D (500) and M (1,00). Numbers were created by putting these letters together in a variety of orders.
On converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers ,we get : . 10 04 1985 IN ROMAN NUMERALS is written as : . X-IV-MCMLXXXV
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals it is: XXIX-V-MCMXCVI But the ancient Romans would have notated it quite differently
In todays modern usage of Roman numerals they are: MMIV MMV MMVI and MMXIV respectively. But the ancient Romans would have wrote the equivalent of 2004 and 2014 quite differently than we do today.
Live with Regis and Kathie Lee - 1988 - 2004-04-05 was released on: USA: 5 April 2004
Live with Regis and Kathie Lee - 1988 - 2004-05-04 was released on: USA: 4 May 2004
La corte del pueblo - 2000 - 2004-05-04 was released on: USA: 4 May 2004
Late Show with David Letterman - 1993 2004-05-04 was released on: USA: 4 May 2004
Last Call with Carson Daly - 2002 2004-05-04 was released on: USA: 4 May 2004
Beautiful Homes and Great Estates - 2004 2009-05-04 was released on: USA: 4 May 2009
For the same reason why we still use the Latin language andRoman numerals are the numerical aspect of it. . +++ . Roman numerals rarely used nowadays. They occur in publishingand in clock-making, but not otherwise because the Arabic system isfar simpler and lends itself readily to mathematics. The… Latinlanguage is far more common, many of its words surviving as theroots for many English, Italian and French words. (MORE)