Want this question answered?
No , according to the Gates website ( they make timing belts etcetera ) the 2.0 liter four cylinder engine in a 1995 Eagle Talon ( IS AN INTERFERENCE ENGINE )
Chrysler's Eagle Vision sports sedan shipped with either a timing belt or chain, depending on the engine installed in the vehicle. The 3.5 liter engine uses a belt, while the smaller 3.3 liter engine contains a timing chain.
No, this is not an interference engine.
no it is not an interference engine.
2 liter 2010 Hyundai a none interference or interference engine
i have heard that it IS NOT an interference engine
No , the 2.4 liter engine in a 2002 Mitsubishi Galant ( IS ) an interference engine
No it is not an interference engine
No , it is not an interference engine
The Vision's TSi trim code always incorporated the 3.5 liter engine (not the smaller 3.3 liter engine). Technically, the 3.5L engine is "considered" an interference engine by sources I've read, however in practicality, it may as well be considered a non-interference engine. This means that when the timing belt breaks when the engine is in operation, allowing the valves to function out of sync with the pistons, no valve damage is expected. (You would normally expect valve damage in this situation because the pistons would smack the free running valves, e.g. the valve would be open--lower into the chamber--when the piston might be at full up stroke.)
The 2.4 liter , 4 cylinder engine is a non - interference engine but the 2.0 liter , 4 cylinder and the 2.5 liter V6 engines are interference engines
The 2.5 Dodge is a non interference engine