The first leap year after 1996 was 2000. The first one after 2010 is 2012.
Yes it is a leap year
Yes. The only leap years of the '90s were 1992 and 1996.
Yes, it was a Leap Year in Australia in 1996, the same as for all other countries using the Gregorian or Julian calendars.
Yes , since it is divisible by 4.
yes, it was a leap year. you can also check your computers calander to find out.
No. Leap Years are years that are evenly divisible by 4, such as 1996, 2004, or 2008. There are two exceptions. Century years that are evenly divisible by 100 are not leap years, unless they are also divisible by 400.
366 days - it was leap year
yes in fact the 19th leap year of the 20th century
4, because there is one every four years and there was one in 2008. So there has been one in 1996, 2000, 2004, and 2008 have been leap years. In general, a year is a leap year if it is evenly divisible by 4. Most people also remember the exception which is a year is not a leap year if it ends in "00" (ie., the year is even divisable by 100). So years like 1972, 1980, and 1996 are leap years, but 1800 and 1900 are not. So why then is a 2000 a leap year? What many folks do not realize is that the 100 year exception itself has an exception. Years that are evenly divisable by 400 are leap years. So 2000 as well as 2400 will be leap years.
No, but 2004 and 2008 were both leap years.
No it is not. A simple algorithm to check this is if the year is divisible by 4, but not by 100, then it is a leap year. Also if a year is divisible evenly by 400, then it is a leap year, but not all leap years are divisible by 400.
From 2000 through 2099:2000200420082012201620202024202820322036204020442048205220562060206420682072207620802084208820922096
Leap Years are years divisible by four, with two exceptions. 1. "Century" year numbers (divisible evenly by 100) are not leap years. 2. Years divisible evenly by 400 ARE leap years. So years like 1992 and 1996 were leap years. Century years like 1900 or 2100 are NOT leap years. But 2000 was a leap year, and 2400 will be.