0
What else can I help you with?
Use of the GPC to acquire supplies or services that are unauthorized and intended for personal use or gain constitutes?
True or false use of the GPC to acquire supplies or services that are unauthorized and intended for personal use or gain constitutes abuse of the GPC program
What involves the purchase of items by an unauthorized or authorized individual intended for personal use ie items that are personal in nature and not likely to be a government re?
Fraudulent Transactions involves the purchase of items by an unauthorized or authorized individual intended for personal use.
Use of the GPC to acquire supplies or services that are unauthorized and intended for personal use or gain constitutes against the Government.?
DoD policy allows for GPC billing statement certification prior to verification that all items submitted for payment have been received in order
What invovles the purchase of items by an unauthorized or authorized individual intended for personal use ie jewelry furs?
A fraudulent transaction involves the purchase of items by an unauthorized or authorized individual for personal use.
Does the electronic communications privacy act prohibit unauthorized eavesdropping by all persons businesses and the government?
No it does not. Though it did appear to crack down on unauthorized eavesdropping, there are still many ways government agencies can get around this law to get personal information.
How do you steal somebody facebook password?
It is illegal and unethical to steal someone's Facebook password. Hacking into someone's account constitutes a serious privacy violation and is punishable by law. It is important to respect others' privacy and not engage in unauthorized access to their personal information.
The electronic Communication Privacy Act prohibits unauthorized eavesdropping by all persons and the government?
No, it does not. In fact, it is relatively easy for government agencies to demand that service providers hand over personal data stored on its servers.
Who personal liability for unauthorized commitments is determined by?
Personal liability for unauthorized commitments is determined by the principles outlined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and related legal precedents. Typically, an individual may be held liable if they acted outside the scope of their authority or without proper delegation. Factors considered include the intent of the parties, the nature of the commitment, and whether the government received a benefit from the transaction. Ultimately, accountability lies with the individual who made the unauthorized commitment, and they may be required to reimburse the government for any financial obligations incurred.
Personal Information may be compromised by?
All of the above. Actual or possible loss of control; Unauthorized disclosure; and Unauthorized access
What is unauthorized disclosure?
Unauthorized disclosure refers to the release or sharing of sensitive, confidential, or classified information without proper authorization. This can occur in various contexts, such as government, corporate, or personal data, and can lead to serious consequences, including legal penalties and security breaches. Protecting against unauthorized disclosure is crucial for maintaining privacy, security, and trust in information handling.
What is considered misuse of a government computer?
Misuse of a government computer typically refers to unauthorized access, manipulation, or distribution of sensitive information, as well as using the computer for personal gain or non-official purposes. This can include activities like accessing inappropriate websites, downloading unauthorized software, or sharing confidential data with unauthorized individuals. Additionally, any form of cyber harassment or engaging in illegal activities using government resources is also considered misuse. Such actions can lead to disciplinary measures or legal consequences.
The electronic communications privacy act prohibits unauthorized eavesdropping by all persons businesses and the government?
No, it does not. In fact, it is relatively easy for government agencies to demand that service providers hand over personal data stored on its servers.
